CC_Minutes_2012_0514 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting • Monday,May 14,2012 Page 16 Councilmember Johnson opined that all of these issues were good points to con- sider. Mayor Roe thanked Councilmember Johnson for volunteering to do further re- search, based on demographics and comparables to Roseville; and suggested the regional area immediately surrounding the Mall of America may provide inter- esting statistics as well. Mayor Roe thanked Commissioners for their attendance; and for the very pro- ductive discussion. 11. Public Hearings a. Consider Minor Subdivision at 1938 Gluek Lane City Planner Thomas Paschke briefly reviewed this request for creation of one (1) additional residential parcel, as detailed in the RCA dated May 14, 2012. Discussion included removal of the existing storage shed as a condition of ap- proval; establishment of the property line by the property owner, and its location not quite perpendicular as addressed by City Code; publish notice provided in accordance with State Statute and City Code; tree preservation monitored by staff and in compliance with the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance; and cor- rection in Section 5.4 when referencing a 50' easement for a pond, that this was an error carried over from a previous case and not applicable to this request. A representative of the property owner was present but had no additional com- ment. Mayor Roe opened and closed the Public Hearing at 7:37 p.m.; with no one ap- pearing for or against Approve Minor Subdivision at 1937 Gluek Lane Pust moved, McGehee seconded, approval of the proposed MINOR SUBDIVI- SION at 1937 Gluek Lane based on the input received during the public hearing and the comments and findings of Sections 4-5 and the recommendation of Sec- tion 7 of the staff report dated May 14, 2012, dated May 14, 2012; amended to delete references to a pond in Section 5.4 of the RCA, not applicable to this property. While recognizing that the property line was not perpendicular to the road right- of-way as preferred based on previous City Council discussions, Mayor Roe noted that the line was substantially perpendicular, even though he would have preferred it to meet the letter of the law, he would support the motion.