Laserfiche WebLink
community. <br />"Aggressive attraction" was opted for by 25-34 year olds and <br />$12,500-$25,OU0 yearly income households. <br />"Active discouragement" was the key for: <br />* Seniors <br />* Retirees <br />* Over 55 year alds <br />* High school graduates <br />* Zone 3 residents <br />There was a clear age cleavage on th$s type of development. <br />Liqht industry. <br />More light industry should be "aggressively attracted" <br />according to forty-nine percent: <br />AGGRESSIVELY ATTRACT ......................49$ <br />AGGRESSIVELY DISC�URAGE ...................34% <br />TAKE NO ACTION ............................11� <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED .........................6� <br />But, thirty-four percent held the contrary view. <br />"Aggressive attraction" was the choice of: <br />* 45-54 year olds <br />* Under $12,500 yearly income households <br />* Zone 4 residents <br />"Aggressive discouragement" was opted for by 25-34 year olds <br />and $50,000-$62,500 yearly income households. <br />"No action" was favored by Professional-Technical <br />hauseholds. <br />Light industrial development should be a key component of <br />any new redevelopment efforts. <br />Retail and service businesses. <br />Retail and service businesses split the sample, narrowly <br />�avoring their "aggressive discouraging:" <br />130 <br />