Laserfiche WebLink
Sixty percent <br />stands: <br />H. I would support some new devel- <br />opmen� to belp keep taxes do�n, but <br />only if the impaat on traffic conqes- <br />tion is moderate. <br />C. I wouid oppose most new development <br />�bat would siqnificantly add to traffic <br />conqe�timn. <br />D. I would oppose any new development <br />which would add further to traffic <br />conqestion problems. <br />favored Statements A or B-- pro-development <br />STATEMENT A ................................5� <br />STATEMENT B ...............................55% <br />STATEMENT C ...............................21� <br />STATEMENT D ...............................17� <br />NONE OF ABOVE (VOLUNTEERED) ................2% <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED .........................1$ <br />But, traffic considerations must be kept in mind when future <br />developments are proposed. <br />Zone 4 residents more often choose Statement B. <br />Sales households and Zone 1 residents frequently <br />Statement C. Senior couples and retirees tended <br />Statement D. <br />Clerical- <br />opted for <br />to select <br />Tax base contributions, then, must be tempered by the impact <br />on traffic congestion for each newly proposed development in <br />Roseville. <br />DeveZopment Near Residential Neighborhoods: <br />Roseville citizens were asked a trio of questions about <br />development adjacent to existing neighborhoods. <br />initially to1d: <br />Since Roseville is a fully developed <br />city, most land witbin the city 13mits <br />is already occupied or held for recrea- <br />tional uses. As a resu�t, much of <br />the desirable and available land for <br />development is adaacent to residential <br />neiqhborhoods. <br />132 <br />They were <br />