Laserfiche WebLink
But, the number of residents unable to comment was atypically <br />high. <br />Code enforcement was well-regarded by: <br />* High SCh0�1 graduates or some college education <br />* Over 10 unit apart�ent building residents <br />* Blue Collar households <br />* $12,500-$25,000 yearly income households <br />* Residents of Neighborhood 5 <br />Among those having opinions, then, code enforcement procedures <br />were very well-regarded. <br />Animal control? <br />Animal control was graded satisfactorily by seventy-seven <br />percent: <br />EXCELLENT .................................21� <br />GOOD......................................56� <br />ONLY FAIR .................................10� <br />POOR.......................................3% <br />DON'T KNOW/REFiJSED ........................11� <br />Lower ratings came from a maderately sized thirteen percent <br />of the sample. <br />"Excellent" and "good" ratings were highest among: <br />* Renters <br />* Over 10 unit apartment building residents <br />* Retirees <br />* 25-34 & 55-64 year olds <br />* Some college education <br />* $12,500-$25,00 & $37,500-$50,000 yearly income <br />hauseholds <br />* Residents of Neighborhoods 2,3,7 <br />"Only Fair" evaluations were higher among: <br />* Neighborhood 4 residents <br />* Zone 1 residents <br />Criticism resulted from the number of loose dogs in that part of <br />the City. <br />Park maintenance? <br />31 <br />