Laserfiche WebLink
favarably: <br />NOT VISITED OR USED .......................43$ <br />EXCELLENT .................................20$ <br />GOOD......................................31% <br />ONLYFAIR...... ............................2� <br />POOR.......................................0% <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED .........................5$ <br />These facilities ranked fourth on the �ist <br />"Excellent" ratings were more frequently posted by 35-44 <br />year olds. "Gaod" ratings were concentrated among over 10 unit <br />apartment building residents and Zone 4 residents. <br />Cedarholm Golf Course at Ha.mline & B-2? <br />The galf course received high grades from thirty-two percent <br />of the residents: <br />NOT VISITED OR USED .......................61� <br />EXCELLENT .................................13g <br />GOOD......................................19� <br />ONLY FAIR ..................................1% <br />POOR.......................................0� <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED .........................7� <br />Criticism was minimal. <br />Professional-Technical households and $12,500-$25,000 yearly <br />income households were most likely to have not visited the <br />Cedarholm Golf Course. $37,50�-$50,000 yearly income households <br />more often felt the facility was "excellent." Blue Collar <br />households and 25-34 year olds more often saw the course as <br />"good." <br />Softball fields3 <br />Softball fields were well-regarded by forty-three percent of <br />the sample: <br />NOT VISITED OR USED .......................49% <br />EXCELLENT .................................19� <br />GOOD......................................24� <br />57 <br />