My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2007_0122
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2007
>
CC_Minutes_2007_0122
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:44:08 AM
Creation date
2/14/2007 1:07:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
1/22/2007
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />public. <br /> <br />(F) The relationship of the design of the site, or the improvements <br />proposed and the conflict of such design or improvements, with <br />any easements of record or on the ground. <br /> <br />(8) The relationship of lots in the proposed plat or subdivision to <br />existing streets and the adequacy and safety of ingress to and <br />egress from such lots from and to existing streets. <br /> <br />(H) The adequacy of streets in the proposed plat or subdivision, and <br />the conformity with existing and planned streets and highways <br />in surrounding areas. Streets in the proposed plat or subdivision <br />shall be deemed inadequate if designed or located so as to <br />prevent or deny public street access to adjoining properties, it <br />being the policy of the City to avoid landlocked tracts, parcels or <br />lots. <br /> <br />(I) The suitability of street grades in relation to the grades of lots and <br />existing or future extension of the City's water, storm and <br />sanitary sewer systems. <br /> <br />(J) The adequacy and availability of access by police, fire, ambulance <br />and other life safety vehicles to all proposed improvements to <br />be developed on the proposed plat or subdivision. <br /> <br />(K) The adequacy and availability of other necessary public <br />infrastructure (including but not limited to roads, utilities, storm <br />water systems, emergency services, schools, etc.) to support <br />the additional development potential created by the proposed <br />plat or subdivision. <br /> <br />(L) Whether the physical characteristics of the property, including, <br />without limitation, topography, vegetation, susceptibility to <br />erosion or siltation, susceptibility to flooding, use as a natural <br />recovery and ponding area for storm water, and potential <br />disturbance of slopes with a grade of 18 percent or more, are <br />such that the property is not suitable for the type of <br />development or use proposed. <br /> <br />(M) Whether development within the proposed plat or subdivision will <br />cause the disturbance of more than 25 percent of the total area <br />in such plat or subdivision containing slopes exceeding 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.