My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2002_0417_packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Charter Commission
>
Agenda/Minutes
>
2002
>
2002_0417_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 10:50:55 AM
Creation date
6/1/2012 1:28:03 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Roseville Charter Cammission <br />Raseville City Hall Counci! Chambers <br />Minutes of Meeting of November 20, 2001 <br />Call to Order/Roll Call The meeting was called to order at 7:04 p.m. by Chair Robert Bell. All <br />members were present <br />I1. Approval of Minutes The minutes of the October 17, 2001 meeting were approved with or�e �ninor <br />spelling correction. <br />Agenda Change — Agenda item III (Annual Report to the District Court} moved to last on the <br />agenda. Reverse order ofi Sobola and Sands agenda items. <br />III. Public Comment <br />1. Bill Schrenker - resident, spoke recommending that the commission disband as a result of the <br />November vote_ <br />2. Sharon Gerber — resident, spoke indicating that many residents did not vote for the Charter <br />because Ward System and even year voting provisians were not incfuded. <br />3. Bell response was that these items were discussed by the Commission but not included so as to <br />minimize the changes to the way the city government functions. <br />4. Georgianne Hall — resident/League oi Women Voters — spoke indicating that the school district <br />would have to change the timing of it's elections if the Charter rrtade changes to the timing of the <br />City elections. <br />5. Dick Houck — resident, complemented the Charter Commission on its' deliverab{es. Spoke a) <br />that some comments were made against the Charter that scared people from adopting it. b) <br />personaf atkacks should not have been part of the Charter debate c) that the charter is an <br />economic way for communities to affect change. <br />Bell response was that all Commission members were polite and courteous at all times and #hanked <br />past chair Vicki Lorenz <br />IV Leaque of Minnesota_ Gities — Lorenz indicated that the Commission received an invoice from the <br />League of Minnesota Cities for woric completed by Duke Addicks. fnvoice amoun# was $fi00 {1 Q <br />hours @$60 per hour). Motian by l.orenz to approve, Sar�ds second — unanimously approved. <br />V. 5obola ResoEution to Dissoive Commission [see Nov 20, 2001 agenda] — Sobola indicated that she <br />was unsure if the Commission could disband or if it was permanent. See statue 410.05-2. <br />Motion by Bell - The next mee#ing of the Charter Commission wouid be held on the third Wednesday <br />in April 2002 and the Commission would solicit from the new City Council what their wishes are with <br />regard to the Charter. Brewer second <br />Discussion — Riach -- Not convinced that we are a permanent body and can't disband, would like an <br />apinion on whether the Commission can do so or not. Brewer — We should recognize the majority <br />and continue to refine the document. Johnsor� — Received severa� calls {9), mostly pro Charter (7 to <br />2). <br />Roll Call Vote — Motion Passed 6 to 3_ <br />Mokion by Riach — That the Corrtmission request a Iegal opinion from League of Minnesota Cities on <br />if we can disband, if nvt then what should be our future action be_ Beff second — unanimously <br />approved. <br />VI. Sands Motion to Amend B-Laws [see Na� 20, 2001 agenda] <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.