My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2001_0117_packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Charter Commission
>
Agenda/Minutes
>
2001
>
2001_0117_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 11:01:57 AM
Creation date
6/4/2012 1:07:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ROSEVILLE I�lITIATIVE & REFERE�-DLT�I SURVEY <br />C01�IlZENTARY BY AL SA�YDS <br />1. Percentages under the columns initiative, referendurn, and recall indicate that those items aze <br />present in that city's charter, and show the percent of petitioners neede�.; based on the base for <br />calculation as indicated_ Lino Lakes requires a higiier percent of petitioners for a special <br />election. If bIank, it means they do not have that feafi.�e in the charter. <br />IlVITIATIVE <br />REFERENDUM <br />17�I�1:\1!� <br />FRE UENCY <br />17/22 or 77% <br />19/22 or 86% <br />12/22 or 55% <br />RANGE OF <br />VOTERS <br />5 -2Q% <br />2 - 20% <br />2 - 25°/a <br />COMMON <br />10 % or less <br />15 % or less <br />2�°/n <br />2. 5 year use refers to the use of citizen's initiative or referendums. 5 year other refers to other <br />city elections held by city where citizens were given a vote, but not because of I& R. When <br />mayor Joy Tierney of Plymouth was here, she said that they always put some bonding in with <br />each city proposal so that citizens are given the right to vote on the issue and so that I& R are <br />not required. That is a decision the Plymouth City Council made to assure public support �vas <br />behind the proposal. Of the riventy rivo cities responding, 4 used initiative or referendurn during <br />the past � years_ There is no evidence of over-use or abuse that I can determine. <br />3. The most important referendum, in my opinion, was the Fridtey vote, where the city council <br />voted to put in a new city tax on utilities (�as and electric) last December. It was unpopular and <br />a citizen referendum to repeal was organized. The repeal vote passed by a 4 to 1 mar;in and the <br />ordinance was repealed. tiVithout the ri;ht to referendum in their charter, they wouldn't have had <br />the opportunity to reject the new taY. This sho�vs the irnportance af having I& R zn place before <br />needed, so that it is there ��hen needed, like an insurance policy. <br />�_ Failed proposals for a city center zn Blaine, a community center in Richfield, and an ice arena <br />in ��+'�hite Bear Lake s�o�v the need to �et out an promote and justify the need., and to insure that <br />the plan is not overly expensive and �randiose compared to voters willingness and ability ta pay. <br />�. Two out of 24 cities who have home rule charter in the metra area did not respond. Twenty <br />two, or 92% responded. I know Coluanbia Heights had a referendum on a community center. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.