Laserfiche WebLink
Sta[ion Location, Apparatus, and Staffing Analysis <br />Roseville, MN <br />weekday staffing was below the minimum. There is a supervision issue which is ingrained in this <br />staffing problem. On weekdays during tbe daytime career personnel provide supervision but at <br />night and on weekends supervision is handled by on-call officers. The supervision problem <br />manifests itself i� EMS most clearly. During weekdays in the daytime, with career supervision <br />present, nearly b0 percent of EMS calls receive ALS care, but at night and weekends, with paid <br />on call supervision present, only about 16 percent of EMS calls are receiving ALS care. On-call <br />staff supervisors are not as comfortable with ALS practices and thus only use BLS as the <br />standard level of care mosi times. This is a level of service issuc which must be addressed for <br />citizen safety. The implernentation of a 2417 career supervision operation xnust be evaluated <br />immediately to address this serious service delivery shortfall. <br />Additionally, locating departmental ad�ninistrative staff at city hall is not the best use of <br />key personnel with supervision experience. Relocation of administration into one of the RFD <br />stations vvould be a much better use of manpower and would allow career personnel to be used <br />more effectively for enhanced supervisory func�ions as well to improve da�ly staffing level. <br />These are the key people in the organization and must be able to interact with all personnel <br />continuously to have the best understanding of RFD operations and organizational <br />cammunications. This relocation will result in better service to the citizens of Roseville. <br />Apparatus and Staffing Analysis – Unless a department considers alternative <br />deployment methods such as system status management used primarily in EMS—apparatus <br />locations should be determined in conjunction with stations. The number and type of units, on <br />the other hand, is determined by risks, demand, and response goals. <br />The National Fire Protection Handbook, 18�' Edition, Typical Initial Attack Response <br />Capability Assiuning Tnterior Attack and Operations Response Capability (Table 10-2A), makes <br />staiTng and initial response complement recommendations based on the numher of firefighters <br />arriving on the scene of a fire depending upon the risk of occupancy {low-, medium-, and high- <br />hazard occupancy). The NFPA staffing recommendations by the type of hazard areas follows: <br />• High-Hazard Occupancies (schools, hospitals, nursing homes, explosive plants, <br />refineries, high-rise buildings, and other high-risk or large fire potential occupancies): <br />At least four pumpers, two ladder trucks (or combination apparatus with equivalent <br />capabilities}, two chief officers, and other specialized apparatus as may be needed to <br />cope with the combustible involved; not fewer than 24 firefighters and two chief <br />officers. <br />• Medium-Hazard Occupancies (apartments, offices, mercantile and industrial <br />occupancies not normally requiring extensive rescue or firefighting forces): At least <br />System Plaiuvng Corporation 19 May 2008 <br />TriData Division <br />