CC_Minutes_2007_0129 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Roseville City Council Minutes of 1/29/07 Pg 34 of 38 hold the character of the neighborhood as strictly residential and protect property values of current residents. Pust moved, Ihlan seconded, DENIAL of the appeal of the Community De- velopment Director's Administrative Ruling that the use in question (offices for Partnerships for Minnesota Futures, Inc.) is not a low impact public or quasi-public use; and uphold that administrative ruling that the offices did not meet the criteria set forth in City Code describing a low impact quasi- public use as a use that "is essentially public as in its services rendered al- though under private control or ownership. Mr. Manderfeld stated, for the record, that the appellant did not waive any due process oflaw issues present due to confusion with staff noticing the meeting to the appellants for the original hearing notice. Roll Call Ayes: Roe; Kough; Pust; Ihlan and Klausing. Nays: None 17. Subdivision Moratorium Study Process Community Development Director John Stark addressed the timing of the ordinance becoming effective based on publication constraints. Mr. Stark summarized potential methods, study group composition, and pro- posed scope of the study, as detailed in the staff report dated January 29, 2007; and provided staffs recommendations for the study group composi- tion, scope of the study, proposed study schedule; and sought City Council direction. Discussion included staffs role to provide education of current standards and impacts of changes; group facilitation; Council's role in the study and overall policy process; role of the advisory group; the need for broad public participation; specific and cooperative roles of the City's Planning Commis- sion and the Housing and Redevelopment Commission; how to best receive the public's input in the broadest and most all-encompassing way; City Councilor Planning Commission oversight of the process; and meeting lo- gistics. Councilmember Ihlan emphasized the need to Council oversight of the proc- ess; and the need to seek broad public input.