My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2007_0212
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2007
>
CC_Minutes_2007_0212
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:44:57 AM
Creation date
3/5/2007 12:01:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
2/12/2007
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />FINDING OF FACT DENYING MINOR SUBDIVISION <br />OF 156 WOODL YNN AVENUE (PF 3796) <br /> <br />1. City Code provision Section 11 04.04E requires that any proposed parcels in a minor <br />subdivision not cause any portion of the existing lots, parcels, or existing buildings to be in <br />violation of this regulation or the zoning code. <br /> <br />2. Section 1103.06F of the city code states that sidelines of lots shall be "substantially at right <br />angles or radial to the street line." <br /> <br />3. The proposed subdivision does not meet the requirements of Section 1103. 06F in that one of <br />the sidelines of the proposed lot is not at substantially right angles or radial to the street line. <br /> <br />4. The city of Roseville has as adopted an interin1 ordinance that effectively places a <br />moratorium on single-family residential lot splits. One of the purposes of the interim <br />ordinance is to conduct a study regarding the appropriate size and shape of allowable <br />subdivided lots, and to determine the impact of subdivision and the shapes and size of newly <br />subdivided lots on the character of existing neighborhoods. In light of these purposes, <br />approving the purposed subdivision's irregular lot shape, and resulting lots smaller than those <br />within the immediate adjacent vicinity, would be inconsistent with the purpose of the interim <br />ordinance, and may adversely impact public health, safety, and welfare. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.