Laserfiche WebLink
City of Roseville — 2005 Budget <br />Discussion Items <br />Funding sources for the City's governmental fund operations have remained fairly stable with two <br />notable exceptions. Beginning in 2002, a number of tax increment financing (TIF) districts were <br />decertified, returning tax base to the general tax rolls. <br />The City's tax levy increased substantially in 2002, to offset the loss in homestead credit state -aid. This <br />was an intended effect resulting from the State Legislature's decision to remove the homestead credit <br />reimbursement to help finance the State's takeover of the general education (per pupil) funding. In <br />2004, the tax levy was increased to accommodate the debt service on voter - approved bonds issued in <br />2003. Absent additional voter - approved levies, the City expects future levy increases to be at or below <br />the local inflation rate. In addition, the City expects to collect additional interest earnings in conjunction <br />with an improving economy. <br />The City's funding uses have continued to emphasize the core functions of public safety and public <br />works. Spending increases in these areas have been offset by reductions in general administrative and <br />internal service functions. Beginning in 2003, Park Maintenance costs were re- categorized as a special <br />purpose function to distinguish between recreation programs and facilities. <br />Finally, the City's debt service payments dropped dramatically in 2003 due to the early retirement of <br />improvement bonds issued in the early 90's. The City expects spending increases within the <br />governmental funds to remain near the local inflation rate for the foreseeable future. Fund Balance <br />levels are expected to decline by approximately $1.5 million over the next two years, reflecting the <br />City's decision to use reserves for capital improvements. <br />17 <br />