|
City of Roseville - 2005 Budget
<br />Net assets of the City's proprietary operations are expected to remain fairly steady over the next couple
<br />of years.
<br />General Fund
<br />The table below shows a 5 -year comparison of funding sources, uses, and changes in fund balance for
<br />the General Fund; the City's primary operating fund.
<br />Funding Sources
<br />Property Taxes
<br />Intergovernmental
<br />Licenses & Permits
<br />Charges for Services
<br />Fines & Forfeits
<br />Interest Earnings
<br />Other Revenue
<br />Total Sources
<br />Funding Uses
<br />General Government
<br />Police
<br />Fire
<br />Fire Relief
<br />Public Works
<br />Other
<br />Total Uses
<br />Other Sources (Uses)
<br />Transfer In (Out)
<br />Other
<br />$ (73,861) $ - $ 21708 $ 1,761,000 $ -
<br />Total Other Sources (Uses) $ (73,861) $ - $ 21708 $ 1,761,000 $ -
<br />Excess of Funding Sources
<br />Over (Under) Funding Uses $ 2203 $ 42,181 $ 253,540 $ 843,352 $ (496,421)
<br />Fund Balance - Jan 1 st $ 4,589,282 $ 4,611,365 $ 4,653,546 $ 4,90706 $ 4,90706
<br />Fund Balance - Dec 31st $ 4,611,365 $ 4,653,546 $ 4,90706 $ 5,750,438 $ 4,41005
<br />Discussion Items
<br />The City's General Fund operations have remained fairly steady with normal inflationary increases
<br />overall. The City has continued to emphasize public safety and public works. Spending increases in
<br />these areas have been offset by a reduction in general administrative and internal support functions. The
<br />General Fund's funding sources remain fairly stable overall. One notable exception is with respect to
<br />state -aid. In response to their own budget challenges, the State rescinded the City's general purpose
<br />state -aid for 2004. In 2004, the City will rely on approximately $485,000 of reserves to offset the loss.
<br />The City expects general fund spending to increase at or below the local inflation rate over the next
<br />several years.
<br />19
<br />2000
<br />2001
<br />2002
<br />2003
<br />2004
<br />Actual
<br />Actual
<br />Actual
<br />Actual
<br />Buffet
<br />$
<br />3,552,575
<br />$
<br />4,064,362
<br />$
<br />5,277,722
<br />$ 5,644,219
<br />$
<br />6,311,319
<br />2,733,823
<br />2,93206
<br />1,350,235
<br />816,446
<br />75000
<br />208,253
<br />227,902
<br />244,550
<br />244,091
<br />287,500
<br />1,018,864
<br />1,145,997
<br />1,222,213
<br />1,119,439
<br />990,370
<br />187,199
<br />203,164
<br />203,353
<br />181,567
<br />222,400
<br />392,434
<br />188,371
<br />546,781
<br />297,407
<br />30000
<br />119,631
<br />118,555
<br />107,051
<br />95,469
<br />36000
<br />$
<br />8,212,779
<br />$
<br />8,881,017
<br />$
<br />8,951,905
<br />$ 8,398,638
<br />$
<br />9,221,589
<br />$
<br />1,592,236
<br />$
<br />1,696,942
<br />$
<br />1,712,671
<br />$ 1,597,790
<br />$
<br />1,395,700
<br />3,676,286
<br />4,011,212
<br />4,077,839
<br />4,17509
<br />4,494,515
<br />958,250
<br />1,048,068
<br />1,113,300
<br />1,322,171
<br />1,327,705
<br />-
<br />22500
<br />330,341
<br />486,481
<br />448,670
<br />1,759,514
<br />1,705,244
<br />1,562,330
<br />1,573,348
<br />1,97005
<br />130,549
<br />152,370
<br />119,492
<br />160X7
<br />80,535
<br />$
<br />8,116,835
<br />$
<br />8,838,836
<br />$
<br />8,915,973
<br />$ 9,316,286
<br />$
<br />9,718,010
<br />$ (73,861) $ - $ 21708 $ 1,761,000 $ -
<br />Total Other Sources (Uses) $ (73,861) $ - $ 21708 $ 1,761,000 $ -
<br />Excess of Funding Sources
<br />Over (Under) Funding Uses $ 2203 $ 42,181 $ 253,540 $ 843,352 $ (496,421)
<br />Fund Balance - Jan 1 st $ 4,589,282 $ 4,611,365 $ 4,653,546 $ 4,90706 $ 4,90706
<br />Fund Balance - Dec 31st $ 4,611,365 $ 4,653,546 $ 4,90706 $ 5,750,438 $ 4,41005
<br />Discussion Items
<br />The City's General Fund operations have remained fairly steady with normal inflationary increases
<br />overall. The City has continued to emphasize public safety and public works. Spending increases in
<br />these areas have been offset by a reduction in general administrative and internal support functions. The
<br />General Fund's funding sources remain fairly stable overall. One notable exception is with respect to
<br />state -aid. In response to their own budget challenges, the State rescinded the City's general purpose
<br />state -aid for 2004. In 2004, the City will rely on approximately $485,000 of reserves to offset the loss.
<br />The City expects general fund spending to increase at or below the local inflation rate over the next
<br />several years.
<br />19
<br />
|