My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006 Approved Budget
Roseville
>
Budget
>
2006 Approved Budget
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2012 1:37:27 PM
Creation date
6/19/2012 1:35:17 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
155
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City u r <br />psjLib <br />1 <br />City of Roseville — 2006 Budget <br />Operating Budget Policy <br />Purpose <br />The purpose of the City's Operating Budget Policy is to ensure that the City's annual operating <br />expenditures are based on a stable stream of revenues. The policies are designed to encourage a <br />long -term perspective to avoid pursuing short-term benefits at the expense of future problems. The <br />policies will enable a stable level of services, expenditures, and property tax levies. <br />Scope <br />These policies apply most critically to those programs funded through the property tax, because it is <br />most difficult to deal with fluctuations in this revenue source. <br />Polic <br />❑ The City will pay for all current expenditures with current revenues. The City will avoid budgetary <br />procedures that balance current expenditures at the expense of meeting future years' expenses. <br />Specifically, accruing future year's revenues shall be prohibited. Practices to be avoided include <br />postponing expenditures, rolling over short -term debt, and using reserves to balance the operating <br />budget <br />❑ The budget will provide for adequate maintenance of capital plant and equipment, and for their <br />orderly replacement <br />❑ A proportionate share of the administrative and general government costs incurred by the general <br />operating fund of the City shall be borne by all funds as is practicable. Such administrative charges <br />shall be predetermined and budgeted annually <br />❑ New programs or proposals shall be reviewed in detail by City staff and both a policy and fiscal <br />analysis shall be prepared prior to budgetary inclusion, and provided to the City Council for its <br />review <br />❑ A request for a program or service expansion or reduction must be supported by an analysis of <br />public policy implications of the change <br />❑ A request for new personnel must be supported by an analysis demonstrating the need for the <br />position based on workload measures, comparative staffing levels, and department priorities <br />❑ A request for purchase of new (additional) capital equipment must be supported by a net present <br />value analysis demonstrating the present value of the benefits of the equipment is greater than the <br />cost of the equipment over the expected life of the equipment <br />The City has become more dependent on local government aid in recent years as the state has controlled <br />local levies and replaced them with increased local government aid. This has replaced a more stable <br />revenue source (property taxes) with a less stable one. One way to deal with this instability is to develop <br />a budget reserve that can be used if local government aid is significantly reduced without adequate <br />notice. <br />❑ The City will maintain a budgetary control system to ensure adherence to the budget. <br />❑ The Finance Department will prepare regular reports comparing actual expenditures to budgeted <br />amounts as part of the budgetary control system. <br />❑ Department heads shall be primarily responsible for maintaining expenditures within approved <br />budget guidelines that are consistent with approved financial policies. <br />113 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.