Laserfiche WebLink
City of Roseville — 2009 Budget <br />General Fund <br />The table below shows a 5 -year comparison of funding sources, uses, and changes in fund balance for <br />the General Fund; the City's primary operating fund. <br />Excess of Funding Sources <br />Over (Under) Funding Uses <br />Fund Balance - Jan 1 st <br />Fund Balance - Dec 31 st <br />(953,993) <br />4,194,152 <br />$ 392409159 <br />2,159,311 <br />3,240,159 <br />$ 593999470 <br />(191819364) <br />5,399,470 <br />$ 492189106 <br />4,218,106 <br />$ 492189106 <br />4,218,106 <br />$ 492189106 <br />Discussion Items <br />During the period 2005 -2009 overall funding sources for the City's General fund operations increased at <br />an average of 8% annually. The City's tax levy increased substantially during this period. A portion of <br />the increase was to offset the loss in homestead credit state -aid resulting from the State Legislature's <br />decision to remove the homestead credit reimbursement to help finance the State's takeover of the <br />general education (per pupil) funding. <br />Beyond 2009, it is expected that the City's tax levy will need to increase at levels that are higher than <br />expected inflation. This will be necessary to offset personnel - related costs and other inflationary <br />impacts. <br />20 <br />2005 <br />2006 <br />2007 <br />2008 <br />2009 <br />Funding Sources <br />Actual <br />Actual <br />Actual <br />Buffet <br />Buffet <br />Property Taxes <br />$ 694689383 <br />$ 792449962 <br />$ 795789944 <br />$ 898549025 <br />$ 899109360 <br />Intergovernmental <br />8309390 <br />8969118 <br />194089823 <br />8999000 <br />9099000 <br />Licenses & Permits <br />2899307 <br />3229444 <br />2869218 <br />3029400 <br />2829400 <br />Charges for Services <br />9709824 <br />191429105 <br />191909422 <br />8759000 <br />9309000 <br />Fines & Forfeits <br />1959814 <br />2559585 <br />2429630 <br />2839000 <br />2869000 <br />Interest Earnings <br />(639550) <br />1709368 <br />1739533 <br />2689825 <br />2579360 <br />Other Revenue <br />1629073 <br />1589201 <br />2789043 <br />2709000 <br />2789030 <br />Total Sources <br />898539241 <br />1091899783 <br />1191589613 <br />1197529250 <br />1198539150 <br />Funding Uses <br />General Government <br />197299063 <br />198609332 <br />198979890 <br />196799695 <br />197169800 <br />Police <br />497039179 <br />590349595 <br />591259277 <br />595329855 <br />599009845 <br />Fire <br />193919802 <br />196559159 <br />198849197 <br />196819825 <br />196439130 <br />Fire Relief <br />3509870 <br />3489670 <br />2509900 <br />3009000 <br />2079000 <br />Public Works <br />197809147 <br />199339040 <br />290749778 <br />294279875 <br />293859375 <br />Other <br />- <br />- <br />- <br />1309000 <br />- <br />Total Uses <br />999559061 <br />1098319796 <br />1192339042 <br />1197529250 <br />1198539150 <br />Other Sources (Uses) <br />Transfer In (Out) <br />1479827 <br />199739674 <br />(2409000) <br />- <br />- <br />Other <br />- <br />8279650 <br />(8669935) <br />- <br />- <br />Total Other Sources (Uses) <br />1479827 <br />298019324 <br />(191069935) <br />- <br />- <br />Excess of Funding Sources <br />Over (Under) Funding Uses <br />Fund Balance - Jan 1 st <br />Fund Balance - Dec 31 st <br />(953,993) <br />4,194,152 <br />$ 392409159 <br />2,159,311 <br />3,240,159 <br />$ 593999470 <br />(191819364) <br />5,399,470 <br />$ 492189106 <br />4,218,106 <br />$ 492189106 <br />4,218,106 <br />$ 492189106 <br />Discussion Items <br />During the period 2005 -2009 overall funding sources for the City's General fund operations increased at <br />an average of 8% annually. The City's tax levy increased substantially during this period. A portion of <br />the increase was to offset the loss in homestead credit state -aid resulting from the State Legislature's <br />decision to remove the homestead credit reimbursement to help finance the State's takeover of the <br />general education (per pupil) funding. <br />Beyond 2009, it is expected that the City's tax levy will need to increase at levels that are higher than <br />expected inflation. This will be necessary to offset personnel - related costs and other inflationary <br />impacts. <br />20 <br />