My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010 Approved Budget
Roseville
>
Budget
>
2010 Approved Budget
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2012 3:08:21 PM
Creation date
6/19/2012 3:05:46 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Roseville — 2010 Budget <br />Also, in an effort to attract and retain high - performing employees, the City makes great effort to ensure <br />that the City's compensation and benefit package is commensurate with peer communities. However, <br />given the current economic situation, the City does not expect to award an employee cost -of- living <br />adjustment (COLA) in 2010. It is recognized that this may not necessarily be an option in subsequent <br />years. <br />The City's asset replacement funding mechanisms, while strong in some areas, do not have sufficient <br />revenue streams to replace the City's vehicles, park system assets or city facilities at the optimal time. <br />The City was limited in its ability to improve this situation in 2009; therefore additional emphasis in this <br />area was provided for in 2010. This included the re- establishment of vehicle replacement funding, as <br />well as continued funding for street and utility infrastructure replacement. <br />The City's cash reserves, while strong overall, are below target levels in a few of the City's key <br />operating funds. Like the City's asset replacement mechanisms, additional emphasis on improving key <br />reserve levels will be needed in 2011 and beyond. <br />The 2010 Budget attempts to continue incorporating the goals and strategies that were identified in the <br />IR2025 visioning process completed in 2007. This process resulted in the citizen recommendation of <br />the following goals: <br />1) Roseville is a welcoming community that appreciates differences and fosters diversity <br />2) Roseville is a desirable place to live, work, and play <br />3) Roseville has a strong and inclusive sense of community <br />4) Roseville residents are invested in their community <br />5) Roseville is a safe community <br />6) Roseville housing meets community needs <br />7) Roseville is an environmentally healthy community <br />8) Roseville has world- renowned parks, open space, and multi - generational recreation programs <br />and facilities <br />9) Roseville supports the health and wellness of community members <br />10) Roseville supports high quality, lifelong learning <br />11) Roseville has a comprehensive, safe, efficient, and reliable transportation system <br />12) Roseville has well- maintained, efficient, and cost - effective public infrastructure <br />13) Roseville has technology that gives us a competitive advantage <br />14) Roseville has a growing, diverse, and stable revenue base <br />15) Roseville responsibly funds programs, services, and infrastructure to meet long -term needs <br />During the past few years, the City has achieved some short term objectives outlined in the IR2025 <br />process. In early 2010, the City Council is expected to develop an action plan to achieve stated longer - <br />range goals. However, given current economic conditions future appropriations for IR2025 initiatives <br />will be especially challenging in 2011 and perhaps longer. It does however, remain an important <br />guideline for determining services and service levels. <br />For 2009 -2011, the State Legislature imposed levy limits which established a maximum operating levy <br />increase for all municipalities in the state. While the City's 2010 levy is below that maximum amount, <br />the limit for 2011 may inhibit the City's ability to maintain service levels. For 2009 and 2010, the City <br />froze spending for many budgeted areas, and eliminated a number of one -time appropriations in an <br />effort to minimize tax levy increases. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.