Laserfiche WebLink
Long -term debt. At the end of the current fiscal year, the City of Roseville had total <br />long -term debt outstanding of $7,560,000, all of which was for general obligation <br />improvement debt which has financed special assessment construction as part of the <br />City's paving management program. In addition, the City also has long -term debt in the <br />amount of $7,251 for the improvement of energy efficiency in the governmental <br />buildings, and $495,672 for compensated absences. <br />City of Roseville's Outstanding Debt <br />General Obligation Improvement Bonds, General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, <br />Long -Term Notes and Compensated Absences <br />The City of Roseville maintains an Aal rating from Moody's and an AA from Standard <br />and Poor's on all of its general obligation debt. <br />State statutes limit the amount of general obligation debt a Minnesota city may issue to <br />2% of total Estimated Market Value. The current debt limitation for the City of Roseville <br />is $52,994,918. None of the City's outstanding debt is counted within the statutory <br />limitation as the debt is either wholly or partially financed by revenues other than a <br />general tax levy. <br />Additional information on the City of Roseville's long --term debt can be found in Note I- <br />D on page 51 of this report. <br />Economic Factors and next years Budgets and Rates <br />• Due to property tax reforms and projected budget deficits at the State Level, the <br />City made efforts to provide for the potential reduction in State -aid and a shift in <br />overall tax burden. <br />• Recreation program fees were increased to reflect the rising costs of individual <br />programs. In addition, user charges for proprietary funds were also changed to <br />reflect current and anticipated conditions <br />These factors were considered when the City of Roseville prepared its 2003 budget. <br />22 <br />Governmental <br />Activities <br />2401 <br />Governmental <br />Activities <br />2002 <br />Business- <br />Type <br />2001 <br />Business - <br />Type <br />2002 <br />Total <br />2001 <br />Total <br />2002 <br />General obligation <br />Improvement bonds <br />$11,055,000 <br />$7,560,000 <br />$ - <br />$ - <br />$119055,000 <br />$79560,000 <br />General obligation <br />Tax increment bonds <br />118151000 <br />-- <br />- <br />- <br />1,815,000 <br />- <br />Lon -term notes pay__ <br />571786 <br />605376 <br />- <br />73251 <br />57,786 <br />679627 <br />Severance pay <br />- <br />- <br />- <br />- <br />- <br />- <br />Compensated absences <br />4861081 <br />4955672 <br />- <br />- <br />4861081 <br />495,672 <br />Total <br />$1334137567 <br />$871163048 <br />$ - <br />$ 7,251 <br />$131413,867 <br />$8,1235299 <br />The City of Roseville maintains an Aal rating from Moody's and an AA from Standard <br />and Poor's on all of its general obligation debt. <br />State statutes limit the amount of general obligation debt a Minnesota city may issue to <br />2% of total Estimated Market Value. The current debt limitation for the City of Roseville <br />is $52,994,918. None of the City's outstanding debt is counted within the statutory <br />limitation as the debt is either wholly or partially financed by revenues other than a <br />general tax levy. <br />Additional information on the City of Roseville's long --term debt can be found in Note I- <br />D on page 51 of this report. <br />Economic Factors and next years Budgets and Rates <br />• Due to property tax reforms and projected budget deficits at the State Level, the <br />City made efforts to provide for the potential reduction in State -aid and a shift in <br />overall tax burden. <br />• Recreation program fees were increased to reflect the rising costs of individual <br />programs. In addition, user charges for proprietary funds were also changed to <br />reflect current and anticipated conditions <br />These factors were considered when the City of Roseville prepared its 2003 budget. <br />22 <br />