My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003 CAFR
Roseville
>
Budget
>
2003 CAFR
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2012 3:46:38 PM
Creation date
6/19/2012 3:43:29 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Long -term debt. At the end of the current fiscal year, the City of Roseville had total <br />long -term debt outstanding of $15,495,000; of which $5,795,000 was for general <br />obligation improvement debt which has financed special assessment construction as part <br />of the City's paving management program, as well as $9,700,000 for the general <br />obligation municipal building debt which financed the construction of the expansion of <br />City Hall and the Public Works Building. In addition, the City also has long -term debt in <br />the amount of $45,378 for the improvement of energy efficiency in the governmental <br />buildings, and $5W x611 for compensated absences. <br />City of Roseville's Outstanding Debt <br />General Obligation Improvement Bonds, General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, <br />Long -Term Notes and Compensated Absences <br />The City of Roseville maintains an Aal rating from Moody's and an AA from Standard <br />and Poor's on all of its general obligation debt. <br />State statutes limit the amount of general obligation debt a Minnesota city may issue to <br />2% of total Estimated Market Value. The current debt limitation for the City of Roseville <br />is $59,084,800. $9,700,000 of the City's outstanding debt is counted against the statutory <br />limitation as the debt is wholly financed by general tax levy. <br />Additional information on the City of Roseville's long -term debt can be found in Note I- <br />D on page 51 of this report, and Note 4 -G on page 61. <br />Economic Factors and next year's Budgets and Rates <br />Due to property tax reforms and continued projected budget deficits at the State <br />Level, the City made efforts to provide for the reduction in State -aid and a shift in <br />overall tax burden. <br />• Recreation program fees were increased to reflect the rising costs of individual <br />programs. In addition, user charges for proprietary funds were also changed to <br />reflect current and anticipated conditions <br />These factors were considered when the City of Roseville prepared its 2004 budget. <br />22 <br />Governmental <br />Activities <br />2003 <br />Governmental <br />Activities <br />2002 <br />Business- <br />Type <br />2003 <br />Business - <br />Type <br />2002 <br />Total <br />2003 <br />Total <br />2002 <br />General Obligation <br />Improvement bonds <br />$5,7959000 <br />$79560,000 <br />$ - <br />$59795,000 <br />$79560,000 <br />General Obligation <br />Municipal bonds <br />917005000 <br />91700,000 <br />Lon -term notes pay <br />455378 <br />60,376 <br />79251 <br />1 459378 <br />67,627 <br />Severance a <br />- <br />- <br />- <br />- <br />- <br />- <br />Compensated absences <br />595 611 <br />495 672 <br />595,611 <br />495,672 <br />Total <br />$16,135,989 <br />$8,116,048 <br />$ - <br />$ 7,251 <br />$16,135,989 <br />$8,123,299 <br />The City of Roseville maintains an Aal rating from Moody's and an AA from Standard <br />and Poor's on all of its general obligation debt. <br />State statutes limit the amount of general obligation debt a Minnesota city may issue to <br />2% of total Estimated Market Value. The current debt limitation for the City of Roseville <br />is $59,084,800. $9,700,000 of the City's outstanding debt is counted against the statutory <br />limitation as the debt is wholly financed by general tax levy. <br />Additional information on the City of Roseville's long -term debt can be found in Note I- <br />D on page 51 of this report, and Note 4 -G on page 61. <br />Economic Factors and next year's Budgets and Rates <br />Due to property tax reforms and continued projected budget deficits at the State <br />Level, the City made efforts to provide for the reduction in State -aid and a shift in <br />overall tax burden. <br />• Recreation program fees were increased to reflect the rising costs of individual <br />programs. In addition, user charges for proprietary funds were also changed to <br />reflect current and anticipated conditions <br />These factors were considered when the City of Roseville prepared its 2004 budget. <br />22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.