Laserfiche WebLink
KE ]�164 - 1) LW E NT E 1�- V1 L ILL <br />INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT <br />April 13, 2005 <br />Honorable Mayor and Members <br />of the City Council <br />City of Roseville <br />Roseville. Minnesota <br />We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, the <br />business -type activities, each major fund, the discretely presented component unit and the <br />aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Roseville, Minnesota, as of and for the year <br />ended Dccc,-mber 31, 2004, wluch collectively comprise zl,-, City's basic financial statements as <br />listed in the table of contents. These financial statements are the responsibility of the City's <br />management. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements based on <br />our audit. <br />We conducted our audit in accordance with U.S. generally accepted auditing standards. Those <br />standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about <br />whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, <br />on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An <br />audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by <br />management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that <br />our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions. <br />In o m opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, <br />Ll L� respective financial position of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, each <br />major find, the discretely presented component unit and the aggregate remaining Auld <br />information of the City of Roseville, Minnesota, as of December 31,2004, and the respective <br />changes in financial position and cash flows, where applicable, thereof and the respective <br />budgetary comparison for Ll u. General Fund, Recreation Special Revenue Fund and Commun *ty <br />Development Special Revenue Fund for the year then ended in confonnity with U.S. generally <br />accepted accounting principles. <br />T <br />