CC_Minutes_2012_0611 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday,June 11,2012 Page 12 Councilmember Willmus concurred, especially with walking and bicycle traffic to and from schools. Regarding the tiered water rate system, Councilmember McGehee advised that she had done her own calculations to develop a tiered system to generate the necessary revenues instead of the large increase in the base rate. She noted that she had tried to attain the target amounts needed by Public Works and found that it was very difficult to attain that goal. Councilmember McGehee encour- aged the PWETC to look at commercial rates from Roseville and peer commu- nities in their next analysis. Specific to pathways, Councilmember McGehee suggested a pedestrian and bi- cycle overpass over Snelling Avenue at County Road C, and at Roselawn Ave- nue as well as other opportunities when a major reconstruction project were pursued. Councilmember McGehee noted the significant safety issues along that roadway corridor; and noted her ongoing advocacy for a pedestrian bridge across Snelling Avenue, while not having any suggestions for funding such a venture. Chair Vanderwall noted his ongoing advocacy for a pedestrian overpass from the south side of Rosedale across Highway 36 as well. Member Stenlund noted the available funding source for roads through the gas tax; however, he noted such a funding source was not available for pedestrian and bicycle routes. Member Stenlund questioned if this was fair in the current environment of additional non-motorized traffic; and whether that was a future source of funding. Member Stenlund noted the cost of a bridge versus bitumi- nous or concrete pathways adjacent to roads; and suggested an option may be for donations for a legacy bridge in Roseville for funding such an endeavor. Further discussion included costs or underpasses versus overpasses; safety is- sues to consider with underpasses; community surveys indicating ongoing sup- port for walking trails; funding challenges suggesting a separate CIP specific to pathways; and how to balance needs in the community and support of the City Council majority for moving forward versus potential foes of many of those ef- forts. Councilmember Willmus stated that "with respect to the Parks Master Plan we run up against out perennial foe, the Friends of Twin Lakes, that objects to a lot of things and so frankly I think that group needs to start hearing directly what the real benefits are because I am not even sure they've taken the time to look at what they are really fighting against." Councilmember responded"I don't think that it is particularly useful for this body to criticize citizens."