My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2007_0319
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2007
>
CC_Minutes_2007_0319
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:45:24 AM
Creation date
3/28/2007 11:26:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
3/19/2007
Meeting Type
Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />March 5, 2007 <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />This provision is consistent with the type of judicial review that occurs in the area of <br />land use decisions. As has been stated in dozens of zoning cases in our courts, the standard <br />rule is that when there is a full and complete record of the proceedings below, that the court <br />hearing an appeal will only consider the evidence that is a part of the record below. Under <br />those circumstances, no additional evidence may be offered by the paliies. I have district court <br />orders in cases refusing to allow additional evidence to be submitted at the trial court level. By <br />way of example only, Council members could refer to Kimmel v. Township ofRavenna, 2005 <br />WL 3372716 (Minn. App. 2005)(unpublished) as an example of this legal principle. <br /> <br />Hopefully, this short analysis will be of some assistance in future deliberations on <br />proposed amendments to Code Section 1014.04. <br /> <br />Very truly yours, <br /> <br />Scott T. Anderson <br /> <br />ST A/sem <br /> <br />RRM: #] 02764 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.