2012-05-10_HRC_minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Roseville Human Rights Commission May 10, 2012 - Minutes Page 4 of 7 citizens and did not have the right to pursue their happiness, none of which would be not be affected by passage of this amendment. Currently the law states marriage as being between one man and one woman, so its passage would keep that as a law. The amendment did not deny equal protection under the law nor was it designed to criminalize homosexuality. He said he questioned why the Human Rights Commission was involved in this issue since it was a state issue, not a city issue. Zac Delventhal, representing the organization Minnesotans United for All Families, advised the Commission of the opposition of many Roseville residents who as members of this organization were against the marriage amendment. He spoke personally of his best friend who he met in a Christian elementary school, which experience caused him to reflect upon his faith. He respectfully asked that others not impose their faith on him; his faith acknowledges the loving relationship his friend and his partner have, Roseville resident Dick Houck objected to non - residents speaking to a Roseville commission. He said he would not speak for or against the amendment because he did not believe this was an appropriate forum for that purpose. Mr. Houck said that the Commission had no authority or right to make statements for the City and its residents, adding that neither the Commission nor the Council had the authority or jurisdiction to make statements on issues outside of the concern of the City of Roseville. He urged the Commission to abandon this effort. Ed Wollerman, a Roseville resident married for 52 years, expressed his concern that gay marriage would put organizations like Catholic Charities out of business because it conflicts with their mission.. He indicated that he had attended several legislative meetings on this issue where the issue was thoroughly discussed, and at times felt threatened by amendment opponents who described its supporters as bigots. Mr. Wollerman volunteered that at times at these legislative hearings he wondered who was the minority. Cathleen O'Leary, a long -term Roseville, said she would be proud if the Commission took a public position against the marriage amendment, and that she would be even more proud if her elected officials took a stand against the amendment. Mary Kay Von De Linde said she wanted to add her voice to others who wanted the Commission to oppose the marriage amendment. She said it is a human rights issue and did not believe anyone should judge what makes a family as long as there are two loving people who would like to make a family. Kelly Skare - Klecker said she had lived in Roseville for thirty of her thirty -four years, and has always loved Roseville.. She and her partner decided to move to Roseville and have a family here because it felt so right for them, and felt so open and accepting of all people. She said her family, church, friends and neighbors supported her and her partner, and asked that the Commission also go on record supporting her family. Roseville resident Catherine Adeboye said she believed the right to marry is a basic human right. She added that she would like the Commission to take a stand against this constitution amendment because she did not believe the Constitution should be used to exclude a minority.