Laserfiche WebLink
764 <br />a fully developed suburb and everything done was a retrofit, not "one size fits all. <br />765 <br />766 <br />Ms. Bloom concurred, noting that a concern in adopting such a policy was to <br />767 <br />allow enough flexibility recognizing that the Cities of Bloomington and <br />768 <br />Woodbury had also fielded a significant amount of resistance to this type of <br />769 <br />implementation. <br />770 <br />771 <br />Member DeBenedet noted the need for this type of standard to always have an <br />772 <br />exception clause; however, he opined that it was important to get the concept out <br />773 <br />there and strive for its implementation to provide for all users in a multi -modal <br />774 <br />world. Member DeBenedet stated that his first criteria was to get people where <br />775 <br />they wanted to go safely; and opined that the TMP tAches on some of these <br />776 <br />issues as well, as does the Comprehensive Storm Water Plan. Member <br />777 <br />DeBenedet noted comments regarding narrower street, traffic calming features or <br />778 <br />parking bays. <br />779 <br />780 <br />Member Stenlund spoke in suppo aff drafting a policy, using the Falcon <br />781 <br />Heights model, as a framework for sion by e PWETC at a future meeting. <br />782 <br />783 <br />Staff noted that initial discussions would nee to e broader, and suggested using <br />784 <br />the "Tool Kit" referenced by Member DeBenedet as part of that broader <br />785 <br />discussion to break things down into detail. <br />786 <br />787 <br />Chair Van*ommissioners all noted his research of the Portland, OR model as another model <br />788 <br />for individ to review; and suggested this item as a future <br />789 <br />agenda ite Chair Vanderwall expressed appreciation for the Falcon Heights <br />790 <br />model since it was community adj ace to Roseville with similar values. <br />791 <br />792 <br />Mem er DeBenedet suggested a City Po y would fit perfectly with that of <br />793 <br />MnDOT and Ramsey County. <br />794 <br />795 <br />Member Gjerdingen suggeste template to review before determining which of <br />796 <br />the recommended models for review would work best for Roseville; and by <br />797 <br />consensus, was referenced to the different policies available on line for his <br />798 <br />individual research. <br />799 <br />800 9. <br />Possible Items fo ext Meeting — June 26, 2012 <br />801 <br />Commissioners and staff reviewed potential items for the June meeting, including <br />802 <br />Assessment Policy revisions; draft Comprehensive Surface Water Plan review; <br />803 <br />Complete Streets draft by staff, and a discussion of the joint meeting with the City <br />804 <br />Council. <br />805 <br />806 10. <br />Adjourn <br />807 <br />Member Stenlund moved, Member DeBenedet seconded, adjournment of the <br />808 <br />meeting at approximately 9:02 p.m. <br />809 <br />Page 18 of 19 <br />