My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012-06-26_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2012
>
2012-06-26_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/22/2012 8:48:42 AM
Creation date
6/22/2012 8:40:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
6/26/2012
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, June 11, 2012 <br />Page 8 <br />the PWETC's appreciation of the City's Public Works and Engineering staff as <br />well. <br />As detailed in the RCA dated June 11, 2012, Chair Vanderwall reviewed the <br />PWETC's activities and accomplishments over the last year and the proposed <br />work plan for the upcoming year. <br />Councilmember Pust expressed her interest in pursuing additional discussions <br />yet this year on organized refuse collection. <br />Councilmember Johnson asked that the PWETC, in their review of the City's <br />Capital Improvement Program (CIP), provide input on the steps taken to -date, <br />as recommended by the CIP Task Force and major outlay implemented; and <br />whether they thought those steps were adequate in maintaining the strategies put <br />in place. <br />Past Chair DeBenedet, opining that this had been his major area of interest for <br />some time, and as he'd noted at prior City Council meetings, his main reason <br />for volunteering to serve on the PWETC. Mr. DeBenedet emphasized the need <br />for the City to not be short- sighted with maintenance of its infrastructure, par- <br />ticularly that underground and not easily visible. Mr. DeBenedet expressed his <br />appreciation for the steps taken to -date by the City;' however, he noted that <br />"you don't get something for nothing;" and rate increases would need to contin- <br />ue or be stable for the short- and long -term upkeep of that infrastructure. Mr. <br />DeBenedet recognized the City Council's rationale in making the rate increases <br />to facilitate the CIP a two -step process; however, he cautioned that the second <br />phase needed to remain in place and occur this year or very soon, and not be <br />forgotten or deferred yet again. <br />Mayor Roe noted that the Task Force had not addressed funding for roadway <br />replacement and refurbishment (Pavement Management Program — PMP), and <br />while there was still a good balance in the fund, there were not as many gas tax <br />money collections creating stresses on the PMP with that reduced funding <br />mechanism. Mayor Roe suggested that the PWETC continue to look at how to <br />address the PMP in the future. <br />Chair Vanderwall opined that good maintenance versus more replacement (e.g. <br />mill and overlay as indicated) should be considered if that could effectively <br />solve the problem and avoid or delay reconstruction projects. <br />Mayor Roe concurred; and asked that the PWETC consider reviewing the <br />Pavement Condition Index calculations currently used; and whether lower rates <br />would provide a trade -off or create more problems in the long -run. Mayor Roe <br />asked the PWETC's detailed review of those options for recommendation to the <br />City Council. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.