Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, June 11, 2012 <br />Page 10 <br />multiple modifications to the program as a result of that process; with the end <br />game indicating the best option and form and a basis from which to operate (e.g. <br />whether to manage the program through a management contract or in -house at <br />the Public Works level). Chair Vanderwall spoke in support of that discussion <br />process being initiated so all potential points could be discussed. While Chair <br />Vanderwall recognized the benefit of fewer vehicles on area streets, resulting in <br />increased safety and longevity of those streets as one consideration, he clarified <br />that the main concern was the current rate variances experienced among neigh- <br />bors; and the PWETC's belief that those rates could be lowered and standard- <br />ized throughout the City of Roseville, based on the experiences of surrounding <br />communities. <br />Mayor Roe noted, and expressed appreciation, for the PWETC's inclusion and <br />productive interaction with haulers to -date, and asked that they continue to in- <br />clude them in the process, and in compliance with statutory requirements. <br />Mayor Roe opined that it was the City Council's desire, as well as obviously <br />that of the PWETC, to be respectful of those businesses. <br />Chair Vanderwall noted the PWETC's desire for more dialogue with the haul- <br />ers; however, he advised that they were more often than not represented by their <br />legal counsel who presented a standard statement. <br />Mayor Roe reiterated the City's interest in individual companies being involved <br />in the process. <br />Councilmember Pust noted the City's implementation several years ago of a <br />two- tiered water rate to encourage conservation rates; and asked if the PWETC <br />had analyzed whether that system had made as much of or any difference. <br />Chair Vanderwall opined that it had not had the desired impact to the extent in- <br />tended. <br />Past Chair DeBenedet advised that the PWETC had discussed reviewing the rate <br />structure last fall; however, at that time there was not enough information for a <br />meaningful analysis. However, Mr. DeBenedet concurred with Chair <br />Vanderwall that there was not a significant impact seen for water use and re- <br />duced consumption with such a pricing tier. <br />Councilmember Pust asked that the PWETC review peer communities and their <br />success rate with incentivizing water conservation. Councilmember Pust further <br />questioned if residents were aware of or educated about conservation efforts, in- <br />cluding the rain barrel program. <br />