My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012-06-26_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2012
>
2012-06-26_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/22/2012 8:48:42 AM
Creation date
6/22/2012 8:40:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
6/26/2012
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, June 11, 2012 <br />Page 12 <br />Chair Vanderwall noted that the County Road B -2 pathway was a key missing <br />component in the network, and providing no off -road walking area along it. <br />Councilmember Willmus concurred, especially with walking and bicycle traffic <br />to and from schools. <br />Regarding the tiered water rate system, Councilmember McGehee advised that <br />she had done her own calculations to develop a tiered system to generate the <br />necessary revenues instead of the large increase in the base rate. She noted that <br />she had tried to attain the target amounts needed by Public Works and found <br />that it was very difficult to attain that goal. Councilmember McGehee encour- <br />aged the PWETC to look at commercial rates from Roseville and peer commu- <br />nities in their next analysis. <br />Specific to pathways, Councilmember McGehee suggested a pedestrian and bi- <br />cycle overpass over Snelling Avenue at County Road C, and at Roselawn Ave- <br />nue as well as other opportunities when a major reconstruction project were <br />pursued. Councilmember McGehee noted the significant safety issues along <br />that roadway corridor; and noted her ongoing advocacy for a pedestrian bridge <br />across Snelling Avenue, while not having any suggestions for funding such a <br />venture. <br />Chair Vanderwall noted his ongoing advocacy for a pedestrian overpass from <br />the south side of Rosedale across Highway 36 as well. <br />Member Stenlund noted the available funding source for roads through the gas <br />tax; however, he noted such a funding source was not available for pedestrian <br />and bicycle routes. Member Stenlund questioned if this was fair in the current <br />environment of additional non - motorized traffic; and whether that was a future <br />source of funding. Member Stenlund noted the cost of a bridge versus bitumi- <br />nous or concrete pathways adjacent to roads; and suggested an option may be <br />for donations for a legacy bridge in Roseville for funding such an endeavor. <br />Further discussion included costs or underpasses versus overpasses; safety is- <br />sues to consider with underpasses; community surveys indicating ongoing sup- <br />port for walking trails; funding challenges suggesting a separate CIP specific to <br />pathways; and how to balance needs in the community and support of the City <br />Council majority for moving forward versus potential foes of many of those ef- <br />forts. <br />Councilmember Willmus stated that "with respect to the Parks Master Plan we <br />run up against out perennial foe, the Friends of Twin Lakes, that objects to a lot <br />of things and so frankly I think that group needs to start hearing directly what <br />the real benefits are because I am not even sure they've taken the time to look at <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.