My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2007_0329S
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2007
>
CC_Minutes_2007_0329S
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:45:43 AM
Creation date
4/23/2007 10:14:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
3/29/2007
Meeting Type
Special
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Special Council Meeting <br />Thursday, March 29, 2007 <br />Page 13 of 20 <br /> <br />Infrastructure <br />Identified goals were: Roseville has a cOlllprehensive, safe, efficient and reliable <br />transportation system; Roseville has well-maintained, efficient, and cost-effective <br />public infrastructure; and Roseville has technology that gives us a competitive ad- <br />vantage. <br /> <br />Strategies identified were: provide a road systelll that llloves people and goods <br />safely and efficiently; ensure a robust public transit system that is integral to the <br />metropolitan systelll and meets long-term needs; properly fund public transporta- <br />tion and transit systems; expand, lllaintain, and promote a system of continuous <br />and connected pathways that encourage walking and biking; pro actively communi- <br />cate about and prolllote transit and pathway options; maintain and upgrade public <br />infrastructure to meet long-term needs; develop and illlplement environmentally <br />sensitive public infrastructure planning, design and construction; provide sufficient <br />funding for long-term infrastructure construction and operations; ensure that the <br />technology infrastructure is in place to optilnize public and private sector perform- <br />ance; develop a long-term technology infrastructure plan; and establish secure <br />funding sources to operate, maintain, and upgrade technology infrastructure. <br /> <br />Mr. Keel noted that there were some obvious and some not-so-obvious infrastruc- <br />ture items identified. Mr. Keel advised that the citizens were interested in consis- <br />tent management plans and funding for long-term infrastructure needs; and ex- <br />pressed strong support for alternatives in transportation (i.e., pathway and transit) <br />and specifically asked for an update of the Master Pathway Plan, and that it be <br />consistently updated as a living document for the community. <br /> <br />Mr. Keel advised that many comments were shared regarding the City working <br />with other government agencies, specifically as it related to the issue of mainte- <br />nance, and in keeping with the economic viability of the community. Mr. Keel ob- <br />served that the citizens wanted a high quality system, and high maintenance of that <br />system. Mr. Keel noted that overall, technology was a theme, with the issue of <br />proactively planning for the long-term future. Mr. Keel noted that citizens recog- <br />nized that the availability of technology was a common equalizer for all citizens, <br />and something of value, providing economic advantages to individuals as well as <br />the business community, and that the City should remain proactive, without being <br />on the outer cutting edge of technology. Mr. Keel noted that, while citizens <br />thought access to wi-fi was appropriate (after the bugs had been worked out), a <br />more appropriate consideration would be to install fiber optic access in roadway <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.