My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2007_0329S
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2007
>
CC_Minutes_2007_0329S
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:45:43 AM
Creation date
4/23/2007 10:14:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
3/29/2007
Meeting Type
Special
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Special City Meeting <br />Thursday, March 29, 2007 <br />Page 16 of 20 <br />An implementation scenario was outlined by the Steering Committee as follows: <br /> <br />Responsibilities: <br />'? Specific assignments <br />'? Monitoring <br />'? Identification of needed resources <br />'? Mechanism for updating <br />Schedule: <br />'? Annual updates <br />'? Major re-do; <br />'? Comprehensive Plan <br /> <br />Mr. Keel noted that the visioning document was a living document; and opined <br />that the City had perhaps waited too long to update the Vista 2000 visioning <br />document; and suggested that a mechanism be built into this visioning process to <br />update it on a more regular basis. Steering Committee members suggested perhaps <br />an annual update on the anniversary of this presentation. <br /> <br />Councilmember Pust suggested that perhaps by continuing the Steering Commit- <br />tee, the City Council could continue to achieve community participation and input. <br />Councilmember Pust opined that there was a richness to this process, with so many <br />people providing their input; and further opined that she didn't want to wait an- <br />other 15 years to initiate another process. Councilmember Pust sought input on <br />how to keep the process going in an authentic way to continue to receive input <br />from the community, not just the City Council. <br /> <br />Ms. Edstrom noted that on a more critical and broader issue, the Steering Commit- <br />tee was aware that the community wanted to be involved, but sometimes they just <br />didn't know how to do so. Ms. Edstrom noted that there were many good ideas out <br />there, but citizens didn't know where to go with them. Ms. Edstrom concurred <br />with Councilmember Pust's observation that the process would only continue to be <br />effective if the ideas came from the community on up, rather than from the City <br />Council on down. Ms. Edstrom suggested that the Council may need to review <br />ways to make involvement less intimidating, and find creative ways to gather in- <br />put, outside of the City Council Chambers, perhaps in schools and churches or <br />other regular gathering areas and groups. <br /> <br />Mr. Majerus noted that, while people thought the Vista 2000 work was excellent <br />and they had great expectations, the hard part was in following through; and an en- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.