Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Regular City Council Meeting Minutes <br />Monday, April 23, 2007 <br />Page 37 <br /> <br />Mr. Miller noted that the Community Development Department fees <br />were detailed and outlined in the annual fee schedule resolution adop- <br />tion, but were not specifically addressed in a policy. <br /> <br />Councilmember Roe, with concurrence by Councilmember Pust, sug- <br />gested that the adoption of the fee schedule be incorporated as part of <br />the Revenue Policy, with language indicating that as part of that pol- <br />icy, the City Council will annually, and as part of the budget approval <br />process, adopt the fee schedule. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing concurred that there was a benefit in having the pol- <br />icy explicitly shown. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan concurred that it would be appropriate to in- <br />clude it specifically here; even though fee discussions cropped up in <br />TIF discussions and policies, when considering public benefits that <br />were consistent and stated as an overall policy. <br /> <br />Councilmember Roe questioned the benefit of maintaining the annual <br />levy based on the City's tax rate as a consistent and general objective. <br /> <br />Councilmember Pust cautioned that budget impacts and contingencies <br />not apparent and within the City's control (i.e., fuel costs, Local Gov- <br />ernment Aid reductions or eliminations, employee health care costs) <br />required the need to maintain flexibility in setting the annual levy. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing was supportive of a policy based on the general prin- <br />cipal, with deviation as required, to tie the annual levy increase to that <br />of inflation. Mayor Klausing, while recognizing Councilmember <br />Roe's suggestion, questioned the impact if a large development came <br />forward, and broadened the City's tax base, and whether the Council <br />would want to require that the levy be tied to the tax rate if a reduced <br />levy were achievable. <br /> <br />Councilmember Roe suggested additional discussion, in addition to <br />staff input, related to reserve levels. <br />