My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2007_0514
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2007
>
CC_Minutes_2007_0514
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:46:24 AM
Creation date
5/25/2007 9:20:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
5/14/2007
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Recommendations <br /> <br />Recommendations <br /> <br />B. Subdivision Recommendations (continued) <br /> <br />B. Subdivision Recommendations (continued) <br /> <br />3. The City Council should amend the lot line <br />requirement within the Subdivision Ordinance <br />to require that lot lines are perpendicular to <br />the front property line unless a variance is <br />obtained. (Consensus Recommendation) <br /> <br />4. The City Council should amend the Subdivision <br />Ordinance to allow single-family lots to be serve <br />private streets if approval of the private street is <br />conditioned on a legal mechanism (e.g. neighbor <br />associations) being in place to fund seasonal and <br />ongoing maintenance and that the street cannot <br />gated or restrict traffic. <br />(Consensus Recommendation) <br /> <br />Recommendations <br /> <br />Recommendations <br /> <br />B. Subdivision Recommendations (continued) <br /> <br />B. Subdivision Recommendations (continued) <br /> <br />5. The City Council should amend the Subdivision <br />Code to require that new houses being <br />placed on new streets within a new <br />development access the new street in that <br />subdivision. (Consensus Recommendation) <br /> <br />6. The City Council should consider <br />recombination and subsequent re-subdivision <br />ofSingle-family residential lots no differently <br />than other subdivision requests. <br />(Consensus recommendation) <br /> <br />Recommendations <br /> <br />Recommendations <br /> <br />B. Subdivision Recommendations (continued) <br /> <br />C. Zoning Recommendations <br /> <br />7. A. The City Council should allow the creation of <br />flag lots and continue to he.ar them through <br />the variance process. (Majority <br />Recommendation-6 votes) <br /> <br />L' the City Council should-create th-ree--levelsof single;fomily <br />residential zoning districts, which include the following <br />districts: (Consensus Recommendation) <br />'Small lot single-family residential, which would have standards less <br />than the current standards; <br />Standard single-family residential, which would have the same <br />standards os the current R 1 district; and <br />lakeshore single-family residential, which would have standards <br />_r;'l:_ciy~:::i1 to that set forward in the City's Shore land Zoning Ordinance. <br /> <br />7.B.Tne.City Council should prohibit the creation <br />of flag lots within the City. (Minority <br />Recommendation-2 votes) <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.