My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2007_0521
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2007
>
CC_Minutes_2007_0521
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2008 2:04:09 PM
Creation date
6/20/2007 9:46:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
5/21/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
egular City ounci ~~tin <br />Monday, May 21, 2007 <br />Page 19 <br />b. Consider Formal Designation of City Council Audit Committee <br />Kough moved, Ihlan seconded, appointment of two Councilmembers <br />to serve as representatives on the Finance or Audit Committee to meet <br />periodically with the external auditor and staff on various finance- <br />related issues as appropriate; and nominating Councilmembers Ihlan <br />and Pust to serve as the initial appointees. <br />Councilmember Ihlan spoke in support of the motion, and expressed <br />her willingness to serve. Councilmember Ihlan opined that by a sub- <br />committee of Councilmembers meeting with staff and the Auditor on <br />a period basis related to finance policy issues and practices, it would <br />allow the full Council to handle routine matters more efficiently, fol- <br />lowing recommendation by the Committee, by focusing on procedures <br />and necessary policy implementation or revision. <br />Mayor Klausing spoke in opposition to the motion, noting that it was <br />his understanding that it was Council consensus that the entire Coun- <br />cil serve as the Audit Committee; opining that this would provide <br />more transparency and enhance communication among the body, and <br />further opining that this was a core function of the City Council. <br />Councilmember Roe spoke against the motion, opining that he didn't <br />see the benefit of a subcorrimittee, and expressed personal concern <br />with discussions going on that were not in the public realm. Coun- <br />cilmember Roe opined that the public would prefer that all discussions <br />regarding financing, auditing and City policies be discussed in open <br />forum; and that if more details were required, each Councilmember <br />had the option of asking staff or the auditing firm. <br />Public Comment <br />John Kysylyczyn, 3083 N Victoria Street <br />Mr. Kysylyczyn opined that all subcommittees were required to fol- <br />low open meeting laws; that subcorrimittees were quite common, par- <br />ticularly in the legislature and/or larger city governments; and ad~an- <br />tages of a subcommittee in being able to delve more deeply into spe- <br />cific issues and make recommendation to the full body. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.