Laserfiche WebLink
eu~ar C~ Co n~~ e~ti g <br />Monday, May 2, 2007 <br />Page 25 <br />that it would be best to call it a public meeting: at which time public <br />comment would be received. <br />City Manager Malinen clarified and Council so directed by consensus <br />that on June 11, 2007, a public meeting would be held at which tune <br />public comment would be received regarding the Single-Family Resi- <br />dential Lot Split Study Final Report and Committee recommenda- <br />tions; that the information packet would include the citizen recom- <br />mendation and signed petition referenced by Ms. McGehee, and des- <br />ignated as such on the City's website and in the packet; and staff <br />would proceed with a normal public hearing notification process <br />would be followed, with the exception of no post card notice to prop- <br />erty owners within a certain area designation. <br />Councilmember Roe clarified, and Council agreed by consensus, that <br />any mformat~on received between now and June ? ? to that ~,~Jas related <br />to the Lot Split Study would be included in the information packet. <br />f. Contract - Consider a Revised Contract for Alternative Urban <br />Area-wide Review (AUAR) <br />Community Development Director John Stark, and Economic Devel- <br />opment Associate Jamie Radel, reviewed the staff report dated May <br />21, 2007, seeking City Council direction and authorization fora re- <br />vised scope of services to complete the Twin Lakes Business Park <br />AUAR Update; presenting two options as detailed on the report. <br />Discussion included the scope of both options, and their advantages <br />and limitations; reactionary impacts without an updated AUAR for <br />developer proposals; Environmental Quality Board (EQB) require- <br />ments; pricing and scope of both options more finely detailed; project <br />changes to-date and implications to the contract with DSU for com- <br />pleting the AUAR under current contract terms; and contexts of vari- <br />ous scenarios. <br />Councilmember Ihlan expressed concern with additional development <br />scenarios and what was driving them, specifically the commercial <br />component. Councilmember Ihlan expressed strong opposition to <br />commercial-heavy development scenarios; and opined that the AUAR <br />should not be completed until a public review of various development <br />