My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2007_0611
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2007
>
CC_Minutes_2007_0611
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/7/2007 8:25:06 AM
Creation date
6/21/2007 11:30:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/11/2007
Meeting Type
Continued
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, June 11, 2007 <br />Page 13 <br /> <br />Mr. Miller advised that the City had issued TIF bonds as upfront fi- <br />nancing in 1982 for a combination of many Presbyterian Homes' pro- <br />jects, one of which had been original construction of the Eagle Crest <br />facility. However, Mr. Miller noted that since then, the TIF bonds had <br />been paid off, and there were currently no TIF bonds in play. <br /> <br />Ms. Bolton concurred and clarified that the request was for refinanc- <br />ing of revenue bonds only. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan questioned the ownership change. <br /> <br />Janna Severance, Presbyterian Homes representative <br />Ms. Severance advised that there was actually no underlying owner- <br />ship change, and that the entity on the original bonds was still the <br />building owner. Ms. Severance advised that after 1998, another prop- <br />erty had come under the umbrella of that ownership, and given com- <br />plexities of refinancing, it became apparent that it would be easier to <br />create a new corporation as the sole owner, through an LLC. <br /> <br />Public Comment <br />Tim Callaghan, 3062 Shorewood Lane <br />Mr. Callaghan sought clarification from the time the TIF bonds were <br />originally issued for Eagle Crest, and agreement with the corporation <br />that this property would remain on tax rolls past the time the bonds <br />were paid off, and questioned if that agreement was still in place. <br /> <br />Mr. Miller advised that he had attempted to answer that question when <br />it had been previously posed; and reviewed his chronological research <br />of the City Council-passed resolution in 1993, and whether such a re- <br />strictive covenant should be included in the renegotiated redevelop- <br />ment agreement. Mr. Miller advised that he could find no language in <br />the original agreement; and found nothing aside from that original <br />resolution. Mr. Miller advised that the property was currently paying <br />$256,000 in annual property taxes. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued between staff, Mr. Callaghan, and Ms. Bolton re- <br />garding such a restrictive covenant and whether it was recorded at the <br />County level. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.