My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2007_0611
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2007
>
CC_Minutes_2007_0611
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/7/2007 8:25:06 AM
Creation date
6/21/2007 11:30:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/11/2007
Meeting Type
Continued
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Summary of Lot Split Comments Before the City Council <br /> <br />June 11, 2007 <br /> <br />Tam McGehee <br /> <br />The Lot Split Study Group (CAG) and its attendant Final Report raise several important <br />policy issues. These are discussed in detail in the attached memorandum. <br /> <br />1. What was the exact scope of the study? <br /> <br />If it was as stated on page 2, then many of the recommendations, <br />regarding overlay zones, pre and post 1959 lots, PUD fees, green building, <br />and tree preservation, are clearly beyond the scope ofthe project. <br /> <br />2. What are the definitions? <br /> <br />When a typical resident discusses "lot split" it is a discussion of whether <br />or not a single lot can be divided into two smaller lots. When <br />"subdivision" is used, it is taken by most to imply an actual redevelopment <br />of three or more units. A PUD is something that most residents know very <br />little about and certainly do not consider it as part of a "lot split." The <br />purchase of two or more lots and the recombination of those lots and <br />subsequent redivision of those lots as a subdivision or PUD is also very <br />different from the common terminology of "lot split." <br /> <br />All of these terms, lot split, lot recombination, PUD, subdivision, have <br />different regulations and processes, some of which are opaque to most <br />residents. To use these all under the heading of "lot split" is misleading. <br /> <br />3. What is the process for important policy decisions? <br /> <br />As ones home is the single most important investment most individuals <br />have, to attempt to make major zoning changes in a 90 day window is not <br />in the best interests of the community. This is an important issue and <br />should be dealt with as such. We just concluded the "visioning" process. <br />There is no discussion of lot division or residential redevelopment in the <br />fmal report. <br /> <br />4. What is the policy for citizen input? <br /> <br />In this case, sixty-nine residents signed some alternative ideas they wished <br />to have considered by the City Council. The ideas were not included on <br />the "Lot Split Advisory" website where citizens could view them. In fact, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.