Laserfiche WebLink
<br />of groups, as single lots, to provide the minimum lot frontage and area required <br />for each structure. The purpose of this provision is to permit utilization of <br />isolated recorded lots which lack adequate width or area so long a reasonable <br />living standards can be provided and to widen substandard-sized vacant lots <br />wherever practicable so that they will be in harmony with the existing or <br />projected character of the neighborhood in which they are situated <br /> <br />It follows that since the R-l Code enacted in May of 1959 stipulates that an R-llot must <br />have an 85 foot width, a 110 foot depth, and 11,000 sf area, houses cannot be built on <br />"substandard" or "non-conforming lots" under the present code. <br /> <br />Therefore, as the CAG and residents were asked to consider a problem that did not exist, <br />it appears that Items 1 and 2 of the Alternative Recommendations should be withdrawn, <br />provided the original code of 1959 is retained. Furthermore, there appears to be no need <br />for CAG recommendations 1,2,3, and 4 of Section C, Zoning Code. <br /> <br />The key to lot splitting is the statement in the 1959 code "to widen substandard-sized <br />vacant lots wherever practicable so that they will be in harmony with the existing or <br />projected character of the neighborhood in which they are situated." That goal, together <br />with the statement recommended by the CAG in Item 6 of Section C, Zoning Code, "for <br />the purpose of protecting and enhancing the character stability, and vitality of residential <br />neighborhoods.. ." assert a clear and strong recommendation about neighborhood <br />character. <br /> <br />The fundamental issue before the City of Roseville regarding lot splits is simple: what is <br />the best way to maintain neighborhood character and provide for limited lot splits? To <br />address this one could look to other fully developed suburbs or cities to see how this <br />question is addressed there. <br /> <br />1. St. Paul has five single-family residential districts allowing for lots from 5,000 <br />sf to 21,780 sf. Within these districts lots can be no smaller than the designated <br />minimum. Variance is granted only in cases of extreme hardship. <br /> <br />2. Hopkins also has five single-family residential districts ranging from 6,000 sf <br />to 40,000 sf. Again, within these districts lots can be no smaller than the designated <br />minimum with variance granted only in cases of extreme hardship. <br /> <br />3. Minneapolis has a stated intent to "maintain neighborhood character." It <br />handles lot division by allowing newly created lots to be no smaller than the average of <br />lots within a 350' radius. Accordingly, in an R-l district of 6,000 sf minimum lots, a lot <br />division application in an area where the lots in a 350 radius average 9,000 sf, division <br />can only be granted if the lots created are equal to or greater than 9,000 sf. Again, <br />variance is granted only in cases of extreme hardship. <br /> <br />2 <br />