My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012_0709_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2012
>
2012_0709_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2012 2:46:09 PM
Creation date
7/5/2012 4:14:34 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
337
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AttachmentB <br />rd <br />(page 3, 3 paragrap h). <br />3) <br />The Wal- <br />Plan in the following additional ways ( <br />see chapter 4 on District 10: Twin <br />Lakes): <br />a.W.® ££¨³¨® « ¢®¬¬¤±¢¨ «±¤³ ¨« £¤µ¤«®¯¬¤³ ®¥ ³§¨² ²¢ «¤ (¨ ±¤¥¤±¤¢¤ ³® <br />2®²¤£ «¤ 3°´ ±¤ £ 2®²¤µ¨««¤ #±®²²¨¦²) ¨² ¯« ¤£ ¥®± $¨²³±¨¢³ W <br />(page <br />4-23). The zoning ordinance fails to take this into account by not <br /> <br />. <br />prohibiting large-scale retail business <br /> <br />W4¶¨ , ª¤² ²§®´«£ ®³ ¡¤ £¤µ¤«®¯¤£ ¶¨³§ ²§®¯¯¨¦ ² ³§¤ ¯±¨¬ ±¸ <br />b. <br /> <br />(page 4-23).The zoning ordinance fails to take this <br />into account by not prohibiting limiting retail business in this area. <br />"4§¤ £¤²¨±¤ ³® § µ¤ ¤¬¯«®¸¬¤³ ² ³§¤ ¯±¨¬ ±¸ ®±¨¤³ ³¨® ®¥ ¥´³´ <br />c. <br />This proposal is retail oriented, not employment. <br />d. Additional conflicts with the Economic <br />Development Goals and Objectives are listed on Attachment #2 of this <br />appeal. <br />4) <br />The Zoning Ordinance is in Conflict with the Twin Lakes Business <br />Park Master Plan <br /> <br />It appears the Twin Lakes Business Park Master Plan also guides development <br /> <br />: a <br />in this area because) the Comprehensive Plan states:The City intends to rely <br />on the following official controls and environmental studies to guide land use and to <br />(¯ ¦¤ )ÿ <br />b <br />and) city staff indicated in their report from just last fall (dated <br />9/12/11) for the Request to approve the Twin Lakes Sub-Area 1 Regulating Plan <br />for City Council that The City will continue to follow the 2001 Twin Lakes Business <br />The Wal-Mart proposal is incompatible with the Twin Lakes Business Park <br />Master Plan (see Section V on Proposed Land Use) in the following ways: <br /> <br />1. The proposed future land use is 0% retail (see page 9). The plan was, in <br /> <br />fact, withdrawn from review by Met Council when asked to provide <br />additional information regarding retail traffic and its impacts on 35W <br />because there will not be retail in the area (section II, page 2). <br />SWARN Appeal--July 2, 2012 <br />5 <br />Page5of18 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.