My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012_0709_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2012
>
2012_0709_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2012 2:46:09 PM
Creation date
7/5/2012 4:14:34 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
337
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AttachmentD <br />land use” states that Twin Lakes should not be developed with shopping being the primary focus, <br />there is nothing limiting, restricting, or prohibiting shopping from becoming a use within Twin <br />Lakes, especially a 14 acre development within the greater 275 acre redevelopment area. The <br />Community Development Department further finds no mention of big-box or large-format retail <br />within the discussion points and general information within District 10 and concludes that such a <br />use would be permitted. <br />EDRGP <br />CONOMIC EVELOPMENT AND EDEVELOPMENT OALS AND OLICIES <br />Goal 1: Foster economic development and redevelopment in order to achieve Roseville’s <br />vision, create sustainable development, and anticipate long-term economic and social changes. <br />The Community Development Department finds that as this goal is more of a vision for the <br />whole City and the wording is describing more of an approach, that this is not applicable to the <br />zoning code per se. However, the Community Development Department finds that the zoning <br />ordinance and regulating plan for Sub-Area 1 in Twin Lakes has incorporated many of the <br />nuances indicated in the City’s vision. <br />Policy 1.1: Use planning studies to evaluate options and to establish plans for reinvestment, <br />revitalization, and redevelopment of key areas and corridors. <br />The Community Development Department finds that this policy is a planning exercise and not <br />applicable to the development of a Walmart within Twin Lakes. <br />Policy 1.2: Ensure that local controls allow for contemporary retail, office, and industrial uses <br />that are part of the community vision. <br />The zoning ordinance adopted in December of 2010 incorporated a number of design elements to <br />address many of the nuances discussed in the community’s vision both generally for the whole <br />City and specifically for the Twin Lakes Redevelopment Area. <br />Policy 1.3: Encourage an open dialogue between project proposers, the surrounding <br />neighborhood, and the broader community through individual and neighborhood meetings and <br />use of technology. <br />When projects are permitted under the zoning ordinance, it is difficult for the Community <br />Development Department to pick and choose which projects should or should not be encouraged <br />to offer such a meeting. Since the Community Development Department finds that the retail use <br />is not limited, restricted, or prohibited under the CMU district, the Department has no regulation <br />to utilize to require such a meeting, even if for educational purposes. The Community <br />Development Department has modified the zoning ordinance to require such meetings for certain <br />application processed and/or land use requests. However, permitted uses are not required to <br />conduct such meetings. <br />Policy 1.4: Enhance communication of the community’s objectives for promoting business <br />development to enhance the quality of life in Roseville. <br />The Community Development Department finds that while more can be always be done to <br />support this policy, lack of resources have limited the City’s ability to undertake this task. <br />10 <br />Page20of27 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.