2012_0709_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

AttachmentH Megan Dushin (SWARN) 266 Ms. Dushin suggested additional conditions for the City to apply to this development, such as limiting 267 operating hours and reducing the amount of public subsidy to this developer. 268 Gary Grefenberg (SWARN) 269 Mr. Grefenberg questioned, if tax increment financing (TIF) funds were allocated to pay off costs, who 270 paid for additional costs to the City, including police protection, and how this represented a public 271 purpose. 272 Janet Olson, 418 Glenwood Avenue 273 Given the history of concern in this area of Roseville, Ms. Olson questioned why the City didn’t make 274 more of an effort to provide notice to citizens about this development. Ms. Olson opined that the 275 neighborhood had poured their heart and soul into making this a positive area of the community; and 276 opined that the City had an obligation to its own citizens. Ms. Olson also questioned how the City could 277 designate this development as “community” rather than “regional” business, based on her interpretation 278 of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map. 279 Jan Bielke, 2070 N Cleveland (1 mile north of proposed Wal-Mart) 280 Ms. Bielke stated that she was appalled at how this whole thing has been handled. Ms. Bielke 281 referenced past development proposals directly across from her home that she and her neighbors had 282 fought very hard to oppose. However, Ms. Bielke opined that at least the neighborhood had been 283 adequately noticed at that time to allow their voices to be heard. Ms. Bielke opined that it was terrible 284 that citizens were not made more aware of this proposed development; and while not intending offense 285 to Wal-Mart since it was not a store that she frequented based on her perception of their treatment and 286 pay for their employees, she expressed her disappointment to the City Council and asked that they 287 reconsider this proposal. Ms. Bielke opined that there was a lot of angst among citizens once they 288 become aware of the proposal. 289 Tim Callaghan 290 Mr. Callaghan advised that he was still waiting for the answer to his question of what mitigation was 291 intended for traffic at Fairview Avenue and County Road D; whether it would continue to be graded as 292 an “f” now and with future development, and why this did not seem to be important. Mr. Callaghan 293 disputed staff’s previous comments related to current stresses on the system creating the problem, since 294 at least four (4) years ago, the intersection had been rated “f,” and questioned if inaction by the City 295 Council was acceptable. Mr. Callaghan also questioned the feasibility of building another Wal-Mart 296 store two (2) miles from another one, and questioned the odds of both remaining open in the foreseeable 297 future. Mr. Callaghan provided his perspective on the operating characteristics of Wal-Mart when stores 298 are opened in close proximity, based on his own research and personal observations. Mr. Callaghan 299 questioned the City’s intent when the property became vacant; and opined that it would be typical of 300 Wal-Mart to hold the property vacant to minimize their tax burden with no regard to the negative 301 impacts to a community. Mr. Callaghan opined that a Wal-Mart store in the Twin Lakes Redevelopment 302 Area was inconsistent with any of citizen plans, with no big box supported and having planned 303 businesses within a viable walking area and easily accessed by residents.With Wal-Mart drawing 304 shoppers from 2-4 miles away, Mr. Callaghan disputed that this was a local store versus a regional store 305 no matter if staff considered it “limited retail.” 306 Mr. Rafael Fernandez 1966 Sharondale Ave. 307 Mr. Fernandez concurred with previous remarks about the lack of information and notice provided to 308 citizens; and opined whether a legal requirement or not, it was prudent to keep citizens informed. Given 309 the short amount of time he had to research and prepare his remarks, Mr. Fernandez asked the following 310 questions: 1) What type of jobs and what wages will this store provide; 2) are employees anticipated to 311 Page7of14