My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012_0709_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2012
>
2012_0709_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2012 2:46:09 PM
Creation date
7/5/2012 4:14:34 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
337
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
While the city will cost share only the implementation costs, the consideration of future <br />maintenance costs are also a factor for determining the most appropriate strategy. <br />While theimplementation of a traffic sign may appear to be the least expensive option at <br />only $250, theadditional per year cost of annual maintenance needs to be considered. <br />A comparison of theannual costs for the most common strategies for speed reduction, <br />increased enforcement andspeed humps, is included in Table 3. <br />Step 5 -Receive Neighborhood Feedback <br />After the completion of the traffic study and the development and evaluation of potential <br />strategies, the city will eitherhold a Neighborhood Meeting or distribute a letter to inform the <br />community on the process and results of the traffic study and provide information on the <br />recommended strategies. Based on the engineering study and input from citizens, the city will <br />make a preliminary determination and recommendation for the need of traffic management <br />strategies. <br />Step 6 -Traffic Management StrategyRecommendation andApproval <br />Once the traffic study results, management strategies, and cost estimates have been provided <br />toAffected Neighborhoodcitizens, a survey/petition will be circulated to ascertain whether ornot <br />the neighborhood approves of the recommended strategy and are willing to cover thepotential <br />costs of implementation. The recommended strategy will not be implemented withoutthe <br />support of 65% of the benefited areaand 51% of any affected neighborhood. <br />In order to proceed furtherwith the implementation of the proposed strategy: <br /> A minimum of 65% ofthe Benefited Area mustbe in support. <br />A minimum of 51% of theAffected Neighborhoodmust be in support. <br />Each household is entitled to one signature. <br />If no response is received from a property, it shall be considered a negative response. <br />If these thresholds arenotmet, the request shall be followed up as appropriate by the City <br />Engineer as part of the Department’s normal function, including coordination with the Police, <br />Fire, orPublic Works Departments as needed. <br />Once approval is obtained from the neighborhood the strategy will be presented to the City <br />Council for approval. <br />Step 7 -Implement Temporary Strategy and Monitor <br />In most cases, the strategy will be implemented with temporary materials and remain in place <br />for approximately three to six months depending on the type of improvement.The strategy will <br />be evaluated to determine if it addresses the identified problems and is consistent with the <br />Neighborhood Traffic Management Programgoals. During the test period citizensmay provide <br />comments to the City Engineering Divisionregarding the improvement. At any time duringthis <br />test phase appeals of the decision for installing the strategy can be submitted andforwarded to <br />the City Engineer. <br />If it is determined that it is not practical to install a temporary strategy, this step can be <br />eliminated. <br />Step 8 -Strategy Evaluation <br />12 City Council Review Draft- 6/29/12 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.