Laserfiche WebLink
within the (CMU) district without specific limitations, restrictions, or prohibitions on the <br />size of such uses. <br />Zoning Code – Statement of Purpose – Community Mixed Use District <br />2.3 <br />The Community Development Department finds that the statement of purpose for the <br />Community Mixed Use (CMU) District does not preclude the Wal-Mart project since it <br />does not limit, restrict and/or prohibit retail use or any size retail use. <br />Zoning Code – Regulating Plan <br />2.4 <br />The Community Development Department finds that the Twin Lakes Sub-Area 1 <br />Regulating Plan does not control use nor limit overall building size and therefore does <br />not prohibit the Wal-Mart project. <br />2006 Court of Appeals Decision <br />2.5 <br />The Community Development Department finds that the 2006 Court of Appeals Twin <br />Lakes decision supports the determination that the Wal-Mart project is a permitted use. <br />The Court of Appeals decision regarding a “big box” use on the same piece of land as the <br />proposed Wal-Mart project concluded that without stated limitations on size or use, or a <br />prohibition on use, within either, the comprehensive plan or the zoning ordinance, a large <br />retail use, is permitted. Although the 2006 decision was predicated on the B-6 zoning <br />district, the Court of Appeals decision and its application to our current comprehensive <br />plan and zoning ordinance is still very much relevant and applicable. <br />2030 Comprehensive Plan <br />2.6 <br />A Comprehensive Plan is a broad vision and general guide for cities to follow in <br />achieving their desired goals, objectives, and policies. A comprehensive plan is not a <br />document that is directly utilized to enforce the identified goals and objectives. Zoning <br />Codes and other ordinances and City programs are utilized to implement the goals and <br />objectives identified in the Comprehensive Plan. The overall Comprehensive Plan <br />should not be construed as an enforcement mechanism for property development. In fact, <br />Minnesota State Statutes recognizes this fact in Chapter 462.356 (2) and requires <br />adoption of a zoning code to put the Comprehensive Plan into effect and the <br />Comprehensive Plan includes a chapter on using the Plan to make progress towards <br />achieving its goals. Therefore, it is clear that the Comprehensive Plan cannot be directly <br />used to directly regulate development. <br />The City Attorney has advised staff that to the extent that a zoning code is inconsistent <br />with the comprehensive plan, the zoning code should be amended to reflect the <br />comprehensive plan. Therefore staff has prepared an analysis reviewing the <br />Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Code. Staff’s analysis finds that the Roseville <br />Zoning Code is consistent with Comprehensive Plan and therefore the regulations within <br />the Zoning Code are enforceable. <br />Square Foot Limitations <br />2.7 <br />The Community Development Department finds that due to the exclusion of any square <br />footage limitations regarding building size in the Comprehensive Plan, the Roseville <br />Zoning Code is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and therefore the Wal-Mart <br />project is permitted under the Comprehensive Plan. <br />Comprehensive Plan - Land Use Designation <br />2.8 <br />The Community Development Department finds that the land use categories in the <br />Comprehensive Plan contain general vision statements of the sorts of things that are <br />PF12-001_RCA_ZOAppeal_071612 <br />Page 2 of 5 <br /> <br />