Laserfiche WebLink
<br />NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: <br />1. The assessment for Improvement No. 93-10 and adoþted by <br /> <br />Resolution No. <br /> <br />9229 <br /> <br />lS hereby amended as follows: <br />Original Assessment <br />$ 28,386.53 <br /> <br />New, Assessment <br />$ liS, 798.00 <br /> <br />Improvement No. <br /> <br />93-10 <br /> <br />(Lincoln Dr. <br /> <br />) * <br /> <br />2~ The City agrees that the interest charged on the assessment will <br /> <br />be as originally assessed in Resolution No. <br /> <br />o'}?O <br />~ ~._::.... ./ <br /> <br />--~-- <br /> <br />3. The City agrees that the property owner may, at its option, pay <br />off the above sums in one total payment as provided by law by paying the <br /> <br />assessment and any accrued interest. <br /> <br />~. The City also agrees that if the property owner has already made <br />paYlT'.ents t.o Ramsey County in excess of the at:,ove amounts that the City of <br /> <br />Roseville will reimburse the property owner for any excess. <br /> <br />~. It is hereby found and determined by this Council that the <br />foregoing amendment is just and equitable to said proposed assessments and <br />necessary to the fair assessments for payment of the cost of said <br /> <br />. . <br />Improvement.s. <br /> <br />b .. <br /> <br />The terms and conditions set forth in Resolutions Nos. 9229 <br /> <br />and <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />9337 remain in force and effect <br /> <br />except as hereinabove amended. <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />The Motion for the adoption of the foregoinrJ resolution was duly <br />seconded by ~lJember Ma.sC~i.l_ and upon a vote being taken t.hereon, the <br />following voted in favor thereof: Wiski, Maschka, Goedeke, Mastel, and <br /> <br />I,vall <br /> <br />, and the following voted against the <br /> <br />same; None. <br /> <br />93-10 (Lincoln Drive) <br />or <br />:){±-10 {Count.v Road C-2) <br /> <br />SJB, 38h .:i3 <br /> <br />$51,202,00 <br /> <br />':"Che ';:)l~r.~Ct. improvement no. sÍl.!.:Juld be i.nserteà and the correct original assessment needs to be <br />iD.serr~ed to ref lect that Lhe ìmprcrvement bearing the 7,5% int.erest bas been reduced by the <br />$9/5.'58.53. <br /> <br />2 <br />