My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2012_0618
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2012
>
CC_Minutes_2012_0618
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2012 1:59:33 PM
Creation date
7/18/2012 1:59:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/18/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,June 18, 2012 <br /> Page 10 <br /> acquisition efforts or in building community support for pathway segments and <br /> connections. <br /> Councilmember McGehee expressed her support of moving forward, and de- <br /> fended her advocacy in seeking a referendum; clarifying that her vote to not <br /> support previous City Council action was not specific to the parks portion of the <br /> funding and the Master Plan Implementation itself, but specific to not having a <br /> referendum for large expenditures of money. Councilmember McGehee stated <br /> that she would continue to support those ordinances and policies in place, such <br /> as the one related to a limit on City Council spending at a maximum limit with- <br /> out a voter referendum. Councilmember McGehee expressed her resentment in <br /> characterizing her as holding obstructionist viewpoints. <br /> Further discussion ensued regarding challenges in moving forward with the Im- <br /> plementation Plan with portions dependent on future community engagement <br /> and further research and planning required before their implementation, as well <br /> as defining or being ensured of funding. <br /> Councilmember Pust suggested that a "Plan B" be put into place once litigation <br /> has been determined one way or the other. <br /> Mayor Roe noted the need for the Commission to begin organizing long- and <br /> short-term capital and maintenance items for reallocation of them from capital <br /> to maintenance or vice versa. <br /> Councilmember Johnson concurred, noting that the CIP Task Force was patient- <br /> ly waiting for word from Mr. Brokke and staff on those specifics in order to al- <br /> low the Task Force to make their recommendations to the City Council. <br /> Through processing that information to the Task Force, Councilmember John- <br /> son opined that it would allow them to better identify items for each category, <br /> since it had not yet been done due to the Master Plan process. Councilmember <br /> Johnson expressed his personal anticipation of getting that information and <br /> moving forward accordingly. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Willmus and further clarification sought by <br /> Councilmember McGehee, Chair Etten and Mr. Brokke reviewed the PIP car- <br /> ryover dollars from year to year; and those items included in the PIP versus the <br /> Park and Recreation Renewal Program (PRRP). <br /> In conclusion, Chair Etten announced upcoming RoseFest activities and events. <br /> Mayor Roe thanked Commissioners for their service and their attendance and <br /> discussion at tonight's meeting. <br /> Recess <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.