Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,June 18,2012 <br /> Page 6 <br /> ber McGehee, Mr. Paschke advised that this was indeed a problem experienced <br /> in the community. <br /> Regarding Councilmember McGehee's questions related to election signs and <br /> their timing (page 13), Mr. Paschke advised that the proposed language for this <br /> City Ordinance referenced and mirrored the language of State Statute. <br /> Mayor Roe noted one additional revision by staff based on previous discussions <br /> with the City Council included page 5, "General Conditions," (originally page <br /> 6, item 8) addressing "permitted," versus "prohibited" stricken and moved to <br /> Item 2,page 5, Item b. <br /> At the request of Mayor Roe, Mr. Paschke confirmed that the reference to "light <br /> bulb (singular), under items permitted should be changed to plural or, at Mayor <br /> Roe's suggestion to "light strings." Mr. Paschke concurred; and further advised <br /> that the clean copy, once all revisions are accepted, would be renumbered and <br /> reformatted as appropriate. <br /> Pust moved, Johnson seconded, enactment of Ordinance No. 1425 (Attachment <br /> A) entitled, "An Ordinance Amending Title 10 of the City Code, Specifically <br /> Section 1010 Sign Regulations; as amended to change from "light bulb" to <br /> "light bulb strings"(page 5, Section 1010.03 General Provisions,Item B.2)." <br /> Mayor Roe thanked staff and the Planning Commission for their work on this <br /> revised ordinance <br /> At the request of Councilmember McGehee for a solution to cut off the allowa- <br /> ble time for construction signs in residential areas, Mayor Roe suggested that, <br /> unless Councilmember McGehee was prepared at this time to offer an amend- <br /> ment to the motion currently on the table, she bring that suggestion forward for <br /> discussion at a separate time in the future. <br /> Councilmember McGehee suggested an amendment for construction signs in <br /> residential areas to be removed once 2/3 of the property was under contract. <br /> Mr. Paschke advised that he was unaware, in the land use area and as an indus- <br /> try standard, of any developments where signs were restricted or to be removed <br /> prior to the development being completed and all lots sold. Mr. Paschke noted <br /> that this provided information for residents as well as those traveling in the area <br /> attempting to locate the development, developer or contact information. Mr. <br /> Paschke advised that he was unaware, from a staff level, or any complaints re- <br /> ceived to-date on the Pulte sign. <br /> Councilmember McGehee advised that it had been brought to her attention. <br />