Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,June 18,2012 <br /> Page 8 <br /> 10. Presentations <br /> a. Parks and Recreation Commission Joint Meeting with the City Council <br /> Mayor Roe welcomed and Commission Members were seated at the table with <br /> the City Council for this joint discussion; with Commission Members introduc- <br /> ing themselves. <br /> Chair Jason Etten noted that individual Commission members would take turns <br /> detailing those agenda items and areas for discussion listed in the RCA dated <br /> June 18, 2012. Those items included a review of the past year, with Master <br /> Plan implementation; review of and increased park dedication; Emerald Ash <br /> Borer and tree inventory status and potential for a future tree master plan. <br /> Chair Etten reviewed involvement of Arizona State University in the Best Value <br /> Procurement process as the Implementation Plan moved forward indicating fu- <br /> ture discussions specific to that. <br /> Addition topics moving forward in 2012/2013 included ongoing efforts for a <br /> pool of community volunteers; collaborative efforts of the Commission with the <br /> Public Works, Environment, and Transportation Commission regarding the <br /> Pathway Master Plan and other efforts. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Willmus, Commissioner Doneen clarified that <br /> the Commission considered pathways as belonging to the community, not under <br /> the auspices of the Public Works and/or Parks realm. Commissioner Doneen <br /> noted that management of those trails and natural resources was an ongoing ef- <br /> fort of the two commissions. As an example, Chair Etten noted the safety con- <br /> cerns and interest of citizens with the County Road B-2 pathway corridor and <br /> connections to other pathways and trails to address those concerns. <br /> Additional discussion included, highlighting grants and partnerships pursued by <br /> the Commission over the last year and their purpose; and Capital Improvement <br /> Program (CIP) versus Park Improvement Program (PIP) budget items and their <br /> specificity moving forward. <br /> Further discussion included the continued partnership of the Commission as <br /> neighbors with regional watershed management groups, including incorporating <br /> those items in future work plans. <br /> Discussion ensued regarding options, as outlined in the 2011 City Council Work <br /> Plan, related to statutory issues for development of a Park Board or Park Dis- <br /> trict; as well as whether to pursue the Local Option Sales Tax, with the Council <br /> supporting continued exploration, discussion and various interpretations of such <br /> a taxing authority, and a clear understanding of that authority, the decision- <br />