CC_Minutes_2012_0709 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting AND Board of Adjustments and Appeals Monday,July 09,2012 Page 18 Councilmember Pust opined that the discussion was still ripe for consideration; and in response to Councilmember Willmus' comment about a super majority vote, cautioned that there should be no pre:judgment on how individual Coun- cilmembers may vote on whether or not to amend the Comprehensive Plan if that were to come before the body. Councilmember Pust opined that her overall goal was to avoid the citizens of Roseville being embroiled in litigation, noting that this had always been and continued to be her position. Based on that, Councilmember Pust asked, if it was the intent of the Mayor to proceed with the motion on the table, that before voting, additional conditions be applied amend- ing the motion. Mayor Roe reviewed the process for amending motions, and suggested that any amendments be considered and moved individually; with the results becoming part of the original motion, with those amendments applied as applicable. Pust moved, McGehee seconded, to TABLE action on the Preliminary for one (1) week. After further discussion, and realization that this was the last day for City Coun- cil action on the Preliminary Plat, or its approval by default, Councilmember Pust withdrew her motion to table. Mayor Roe reviewed the motion currently before the body to approve the Pre- liminary Plat, inclusive of the ten (10) enumerated conditions included in the City Attorney's memorandum dated July 9, 2012. At the request of Councilmember Willmus, Councilmember Pust reviewed her additional conditions beyond those recommended by the City Attorney's Office. Amendments Councilmember Pust suggested a condition that the applicant waived the one (1) year time period exemption to any potential Comprehensive Plan Revision(s). Councilmember Pust sought clarification of the word, "conclusion," in City At- torney Office Condition #10 regarding issuance of any building permits; and suggested that it be more specific. Councilmember Pust suggested a condition specifically addressing hours of op- eration of the proposed facility, while recognizing that this could be interpreted as a use issue. However, Councilmember Pust, based on her research of LMC publications, noted that conditions are applied to use at the Preliminary Plat stage. In order to assure the community that this facility not be operated on a 24-hour basis, Councilmember Pust opined that this was the time to have that conversation.