My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2012_0709
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2012
>
CC_Minutes_2012_0709
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2012 2:43:58 PM
Creation date
7/19/2012 2:43:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/9/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting AND <br /> Board of Adjustments and Appeals <br /> Monday,July 09,2012 <br /> Page 22 <br /> City Attorney Gaughan echoed the Mayor's concerns that no arbitrary figure <br /> was used, and thereby undermining the appropriateness of this type of condi- <br /> tion. City Attorney Gaughan cautioned the City Council to avoid moving any- <br /> where near an arbitrary and capricious situation. <br /> Councilmember Pust respectfully requested a five minute recess to research past <br /> meeting minutes specific to projected service levels by Chief Mathwig. <br /> Recess <br /> Mayor Roe recessed the meeting at approximately 7:44 p.m. and reconvened at approximately <br /> 7:54 p.m. <br /> Councilmember Pust advised that her research specific to proposed Condition <br /> #12 had provided projections, from Chief Mathwig, of between 700-900 addi- <br /> tional calls per year with a retailer the size of the proposed Wal-Mart. <br /> City Manager Malinen advised that he had consulted with Chief Mathwig by <br /> phone during the recess, and Chief Mathwig advised that the SuperTarget Store <br /> in Roseville had an average of 175 service calls per year of various types. City <br /> Manager Malinen advised that Chief Mathwig had opined that a number of 300 <br /> calls per year for a similar operation, and based on the proposed Wal-Mart size <br /> and facility, appeared reasonable. <br /> Councilmember Pust opined that such a condition would also allow a new busi- <br /> ness to establish their business model. <br /> City Attorney Gaughan advised that he was unable to provide a definitive an- <br /> swer as to whether the proposed language of Councilmember Pust's amendment <br /> (Condition #12) provided sufficient statistical analysis to avoid any arbitrary or <br /> capricious concerns; and based on the significant retail already in Roseville, <br /> questioned how a determination could be made as to what factors played into <br /> those statistics. <br /> CONDITION#12 (REVISED) <br /> Pust moved, Johnson seconded, amendment to the original motion by the ad- <br /> dition of Condition #12 that: "Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust shall <br /> agree to enter into a Development Agreement satisfactory to the City, which <br /> includes a provision that for one (1)year, Wal-Mart will pay for any law en- <br /> forcement costs associated with services provided to their operations in excess <br /> of a base line of three hundred (300) calls per annum; with a review of that <br /> data after one (1)year)for any potential adjustment <br /> Will Matzek, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., Civil Engineer of Record for Wal-Mart <br /> Development Team <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.