2012_0723_as amended - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

4. The access points to enter and exit the Property being plated shall be at locations 83 approved by the City and any other governmental entity having jurisdiction over 84 adjacent roadways. 85 5. Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust shall install subdivision monuments as 86 reasonably required by the Roseville Public Works Department and Ramsey County 87 Surveyor. 88 6. Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust shall pay all unpaid subdivision review escrow 89 fees as detailed in the adopted fee schedule for the City of Roseville prior to the City 90 releasing the Plat for recording. 91 7. The applicant shall make all submissions and perform all requirements pertaining to 92 final plats set forth in Roseville City Code, including Sections 1002.01, 1102.04, 93 1102.06 and 1102.07. 94 8. The applicant shall obtain the written certification from the Public Works Director 95 described in Section 1102.06 of Roseville City Code. 96 9. The City Council, acting as the Board of Adjustments and Appeals, shall determine 97 whether the proposed use for the property is a permitted use. No building permits shall 98 be issued for any use of the property which is not a permitted use. 99 10. No building permits shall be issued for any use of the property until the conclusion of 100 the appellate matter captioned as “In the Matter of the Petition for an Environmental 101 Assessment Worksheet for a Proposed “Wal-Mart Store in Roseville, Ramsey County, 102 Minnesota” (Writ of Certiorari dated June 21, 2012). 103 Councilmember Pust apologized to the public and fellow Councilmembers for her late arrival 104 tonight; and asked patience as she clarified her remaining questions, some of which may have 105 been addressed prior to her arrival. Councilmember Pust reviewed her perception of the Appeal 106 process and referral to the Planning Commission for their recommendation to the Board of 107 Adjustments and Appeals. Councilmember Pust questioned when those recommendations would 108 return to the Board of Appeals, and what opportunities would be provided for public comment 109 and at which body. 110 Mayor Roe reiterated the process, with non-formal public testimony opportunities provided at 111 the June 11, 2012 Planning Commission meeting, as well as again at the July 16, 2012 Board of 112 Adjustments and Appeals meeting. 113 Councilmember Pust commended staff’s most recent recommendation in breaking up the 114 Preliminary and Final Plat approval process, serving to address her previously-expressed 115 concerns with that process. Councilmember Pust, based on her research, opined that the 116 Preliminary Plat portion was very important in the decision-making process, and essentially the 117 only time conditions could be applied to that potential approval process. Since this is a 118 significant decision, Councilmember Pust respectfully requested that fellow Councilmembers 119 consider delaying making this decision for one (1) more week, following recommends of the 120 Planning Commission and subsequent action by the Board of Adjustments and Appeals. 121 Councilmember Pust reviewed her remaining concerns, beyond those conditions recommended 122 by the City Attorney in their July 9, 2012 correspondence. While recognizing that disapproval of 123 a permitted use was not a consideration for Preliminary Plat approval or denial, based on case 124