My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012-06-26_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2012
>
2012-06-26_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2012 11:27:48 AM
Creation date
7/31/2012 11:27:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
6/26/2012
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Leaf noted that an additional Policy Statement could be included to <br /> incorporate monitoring; and advised that they would research what was currently <br /> available. Mr. Leaf noted that it would be difficult to monitor every infiltration <br /> basin throughout the City; however, staff could identify high risk areas or smaller <br /> subwatersheds. <br /> Chair Vanderwall suggested language that would provide for any impervious <br /> surface of 25,000 square feet or more, or something to that effect. <br /> Member DeBenedet expressed his preference that it would tie more to land use or <br /> commercial uses. <br /> However, Chair DeBenedet noted that it could also affect schools and churches <br /> with large parking lots and/or impervious surfaces. <br /> Member Stenlund arrived at this time, approximately 7.40 p.m. <br /> Goal 4—Public Education and Outreach (Table 10) <br /> Member Felice noted her ongoing frustration with the education and outreach <br /> opportunities provided and the few people who attend them, using the June 21, <br /> 2012 public information meeting for the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan <br /> as an example. Member Felice opined that people needed to be educated where <br /> they were; and suggested signage at storm water ponds and other applicable <br /> locations that would provide that education by graphics and statements of the <br /> purpose of the ponds and what was supposed to happen. Member Felice opined <br /> that this would provide a better educational opportunity in the place of publishing <br /> information or holding meetings with little result. Member Felice suggested that, <br /> while residents were walking, they could be educated at the same time through <br /> signage. <br /> Ms. Bloom concurred; however, she asked for clarification if that was a Goal, a <br /> Policy, or an Implementation Strategy. Ms. Bloom restated Member Felice's <br /> original statement as "educate people where they're ready to be educated." <br /> Chair Vanderwall opined that he heard it as a Policy to ensure that the City had an <br /> "effective public education and outreach tool or process." <br /> Member Felice suggested a Policy or Implementation Strategy would be to <br /> identify areas where educational signs could have the most impact. <br /> Member Gjerdingen suggested including that signage and narrative information <br /> on the City's website as well. <br /> Chair Vanderwall suggested that there may be other options as well to attract <br /> people's attention as they moved throughout the community, and opined that it <br /> shouldn't stop at signage. <br /> Page 10 of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.