My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012-06-26_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2012
>
2012-06-26_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2012 11:27:48 AM
Creation date
7/31/2012 11:27:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
6/26/2012
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Bloom noted that the Policies said to "encourage," and "support" and staff <br /> could provide options accordingly. <br /> Member Stenlund noted that they could be pieces of the puzzle, rather than <br /> relying on one option. <br /> At the request of Ms. Bloom regarding Policy No. 2 and whether that achieved the <br /> intent, Member Stenlund opined that it did not; and that phosphorus needed to be <br /> identified as a stressor, and an option provided for phosphorus reduction that <br /> could be managed and maintained. <br /> Ms. Bloom suggested that staff could add another goal to address those stressors. <br /> Member Gjerdingen suggested a fifth policy that the "City shall review BMP's <br /> that lend to long-term or easy maintenance..." <br /> Member Felice advised that it would be useful to have some record retained by <br /> the City of successful projects to serve as models for residents. <br /> Ms. Bloom advised that this would be a good Implementation Strategy. <br /> Implementation Plan <br /> With Mr. Leaf seeking initial comments of the PWETC related to the <br /> Implementation Plan, Ms. Bloom suggested that those comments be held until the <br /> next meeting. Ms. Bloom advised that staff would incorporate tonight's <br /> comments in the next draft. Ms. Bloom noted that, as always, individual feedback <br /> and comments were encouraged from Members between meetings for review off- <br /> line. <br /> Member DeBenedet reminded staff of the request that revisions from tonight's <br /> discussion be provided at least one (1) week prior to the next month's meeting. <br /> Member Stenlund suggested a goal be included to provide an understanding that <br /> progressive thinking to address future needs will need to be provided beyond <br /> today's water quality technologies and efforts. <br /> Mr. Leaf noted that this was the intent of the Plan, to address where the City <br /> should be going. <br /> Member DeBenedet questioned how to focus on those proactive technologies for <br /> implementation (e.g. upgraded water data for large rain events, and monitoring <br /> large site infiltration systems). <br /> Mr. Leaf noted that he considered that part of the entire sustainability process for <br /> the whole system, and taking all factors into consideration. <br /> Page 16 of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.