My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012-06-26_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2012
>
2012-06-26_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2012 11:27:48 AM
Creation date
7/31/2012 11:27:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
6/26/2012
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Member Gjerdingen suggested that the PWETC become more proactive in <br /> providing the City Council with recommended motions on items moving forward, <br /> similar to that provided by staff in their reports to the City Council and action <br /> requests. <br /> Member Felice stated that a lot of ground was covered during the joint meeting, <br /> and she appreciated the receptiveness of the City Council toward the PWETC and <br /> its accomplishments and upcoming work plan. <br /> Chair Vanderwall noted that he left the meeting feeling that, even thought the <br /> PWETC was a citizen volunteer group, the City Council considered <br /> recommendations of the group as meaningful and important to the work of the <br /> City Council. <br /> 6. Final Vote on Organized Collection <br /> Member Felice opined that, with all the time spent on this issue to-date and <br /> hearing from all parties, it was time to move forward and achieve a positive <br /> potential outcome. <br /> Chair Vanderwall expressed his regret that Member Stenlund was not in <br /> attendance for this vote; however, he noted that Member Stenlund had been a <br /> strong and consistent advocate in support of organized collection. <br /> Member DeBenedet commented on one area of concern with the draft resolution <br /> on page 1 in the "NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED..." introductory <br /> statement; and suggested revised language to read as follows: <br /> "NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Roseville, <br /> Public Works, Environment, and Transportation Commission hereby <br /> recommends to the Roseville City Council to[begin the state-mandated <br /> process to implement]organized solid waste collection in the City of <br /> Roseville with the consideration of the following goals:..." <br /> Member DeBenedet opined that the actual PWETC recommendation is that the <br /> City Council begin the process, including the lengthy discussion between haulers <br /> and the City, and just recommending that the process be initiated, not whether it <br /> actually comes to fruition in the end. <br /> Member Gjerdingen expressed concern in the PWETC appearing to make an <br /> actual commitment; with Chair Vanderwall clarifying that there was no <br /> commitment,just initiating a very lengthy process. <br /> Member DeBenedet moved, Member Gjerdingen seconded, the adoption of a <br /> resolution entitled, "Resolution Recommending Consideration of Organized Trash <br /> Collection;" for formal recommendation to the Roseville City Council; with page <br /> I amended to read as follows: <br /> Page 5 of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.